Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > AMHP work: dirty or prestigious?

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

AMHP work: dirty or prestigious?: dirty work designations and the approved mental health professional

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

AMHP work: dirty or prestigious? dirty work designations and the approved mental health professional. / Morriss, Lisa.
In: British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 46, No. 3, 04.2016, p. 703-718.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Morriss L. AMHP work: dirty or prestigious? dirty work designations and the approved mental health professional. British Journal of Social Work. 2016 Apr;46(3):703-718. Epub 2015 Feb 26. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcv009

Author

Morriss, Lisa. / AMHP work: dirty or prestigious? dirty work designations and the approved mental health professional. In: British Journal of Social Work. 2016 ; Vol. 46, No. 3. pp. 703-718.

Bibtex

@article{2432e8f280b1476db021210be7bf82e7,
title = "AMHP work: dirty or prestigious?: dirty work designations and the approved mental health professional",
abstract = "The paper explores the notion of {\textquoteleft}dirty work{\textquoteright} in relation to the newly created role of the Approved Mental Health Professional (AMHP). An AMHP undertakes various duties set out in the 1983 Mental Health Act, as amended by the 2007 Act, in relation to assessments to make applications for compulsory admission to psychiatric hospital. It has been argued that undertaking this social control function is {\textquoteleft}dirty work{\textquoteright}. However, the findings from a study of social work AMHPs in England suggest that the picture is more complex. Extracts from narrative interviews are analysed using dialogical narrative analysis. Rather than being designated as dirty work, AMHP duty was presented as prestigious and as advanced social work. However, through their storytelling, the social workers clearly delineated the aspects of AMHP work that they did designate as dirty, specifically the lack of beds, the complexities of co-ordination and the emotional labour which is an inherent part of the work.",
keywords = "Approved Mental Health Professional, social work, mental health, dirty work",
author = "Lisa Morriss",
year = "2016",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1093/bjsw/bcv009",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "703--718",
journal = "British Journal of Social Work",
issn = "0045-3102",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - AMHP work: dirty or prestigious?

T2 - dirty work designations and the approved mental health professional

AU - Morriss, Lisa

PY - 2016/4

Y1 - 2016/4

N2 - The paper explores the notion of ‘dirty work’ in relation to the newly created role of the Approved Mental Health Professional (AMHP). An AMHP undertakes various duties set out in the 1983 Mental Health Act, as amended by the 2007 Act, in relation to assessments to make applications for compulsory admission to psychiatric hospital. It has been argued that undertaking this social control function is ‘dirty work’. However, the findings from a study of social work AMHPs in England suggest that the picture is more complex. Extracts from narrative interviews are analysed using dialogical narrative analysis. Rather than being designated as dirty work, AMHP duty was presented as prestigious and as advanced social work. However, through their storytelling, the social workers clearly delineated the aspects of AMHP work that they did designate as dirty, specifically the lack of beds, the complexities of co-ordination and the emotional labour which is an inherent part of the work.

AB - The paper explores the notion of ‘dirty work’ in relation to the newly created role of the Approved Mental Health Professional (AMHP). An AMHP undertakes various duties set out in the 1983 Mental Health Act, as amended by the 2007 Act, in relation to assessments to make applications for compulsory admission to psychiatric hospital. It has been argued that undertaking this social control function is ‘dirty work’. However, the findings from a study of social work AMHPs in England suggest that the picture is more complex. Extracts from narrative interviews are analysed using dialogical narrative analysis. Rather than being designated as dirty work, AMHP duty was presented as prestigious and as advanced social work. However, through their storytelling, the social workers clearly delineated the aspects of AMHP work that they did designate as dirty, specifically the lack of beds, the complexities of co-ordination and the emotional labour which is an inherent part of the work.

KW - Approved Mental Health Professional

KW - social work

KW - mental health

KW - dirty work

U2 - 10.1093/bjsw/bcv009

DO - 10.1093/bjsw/bcv009

M3 - Journal article

VL - 46

SP - 703

EP - 718

JO - British Journal of Social Work

JF - British Journal of Social Work

SN - 0045-3102

IS - 3

ER -