Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > An analysis of costs in institutions of higher ...

Electronic data

View graph of relations

An analysis of costs in institutions of higher education in England

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

An analysis of costs in institutions of higher education in England. / Thanassoulis, E; Johnes, G; Johnes, J.
Lancaster University: The Department of Economics, 2005. (Economics Working Paper Series).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Thanassoulis, E, Johnes, G & Johnes, J 2005 'An analysis of costs in institutions of higher education in England' Economics Working Paper Series, The Department of Economics, Lancaster University.

APA

Thanassoulis, E., Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (2005). An analysis of costs in institutions of higher education in England. (Economics Working Paper Series). The Department of Economics.

Vancouver

Thanassoulis E, Johnes G, Johnes J. An analysis of costs in institutions of higher education in England. Lancaster University: The Department of Economics. 2005. (Economics Working Paper Series).

Author

Thanassoulis, E ; Johnes, G ; Johnes, J. / An analysis of costs in institutions of higher education in England. Lancaster University : The Department of Economics, 2005. (Economics Working Paper Series).

Bibtex

@techreport{d15f859658f74b0b99523536aa3ed87f,
title = "An analysis of costs in institutions of higher education in England",
abstract = "Cost functions are estimated, using both random effects and stochastic frontier methods, for institutions of higher education in England. The paper advances on the existing literature by employing finer disaggregation by subject, institution type, and location, and by introducing consideration of quality effects. The findings are that, amongst undergraduates, medical students are the most costly, and non-science students the least; amongst postgraduates, those on taught courses are costly, while research students are relatively inexpensive. Provision in London is found to be more costly than that elsewhere. Estimates of economies of scale and economies of scope vary according to the choice of estimating technique. The random effects model suggests that ray economies of scale and economies of scope are ubiquitous. The stochastic frontier model suggests some product-specific economies of scale in research, but diseconomies elsewhere, and product specific economies of scope in undergraduate science, but diseconomies elsewhere. This has implications for achieving any expansion in higher education.",
keywords = "higher education, cost functions",
author = "E Thanassoulis and G Johnes and J Johnes",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
series = "Economics Working Paper Series",
publisher = "The Department of Economics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "The Department of Economics",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - An analysis of costs in institutions of higher education in England

AU - Thanassoulis, E

AU - Johnes, G

AU - Johnes, J

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Cost functions are estimated, using both random effects and stochastic frontier methods, for institutions of higher education in England. The paper advances on the existing literature by employing finer disaggregation by subject, institution type, and location, and by introducing consideration of quality effects. The findings are that, amongst undergraduates, medical students are the most costly, and non-science students the least; amongst postgraduates, those on taught courses are costly, while research students are relatively inexpensive. Provision in London is found to be more costly than that elsewhere. Estimates of economies of scale and economies of scope vary according to the choice of estimating technique. The random effects model suggests that ray economies of scale and economies of scope are ubiquitous. The stochastic frontier model suggests some product-specific economies of scale in research, but diseconomies elsewhere, and product specific economies of scope in undergraduate science, but diseconomies elsewhere. This has implications for achieving any expansion in higher education.

AB - Cost functions are estimated, using both random effects and stochastic frontier methods, for institutions of higher education in England. The paper advances on the existing literature by employing finer disaggregation by subject, institution type, and location, and by introducing consideration of quality effects. The findings are that, amongst undergraduates, medical students are the most costly, and non-science students the least; amongst postgraduates, those on taught courses are costly, while research students are relatively inexpensive. Provision in London is found to be more costly than that elsewhere. Estimates of economies of scale and economies of scope vary according to the choice of estimating technique. The random effects model suggests that ray economies of scale and economies of scope are ubiquitous. The stochastic frontier model suggests some product-specific economies of scale in research, but diseconomies elsewhere, and product specific economies of scope in undergraduate science, but diseconomies elsewhere. This has implications for achieving any expansion in higher education.

KW - higher education

KW - cost functions

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Economics Working Paper Series

BT - An analysis of costs in institutions of higher education in England

PB - The Department of Economics

CY - Lancaster University

ER -