Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - An array of deficits
T2 - unpacking NIMBY discourses in wind energy developers' conceptualizations of their local opponents
AU - Burningham, Kate
AU - Barnett, Julie
AU - Walker, Gordon
PY - 2015/3/4
Y1 - 2015/3/4
N2 - UK energy policy contains ambitious goals for increased deployment of renewable energy technologies (RETs), but concern remains about the potential of local opposition to obstruct proposed developments. Despite emerging academic consensus that characterizing opposition to RET siting as NIMBYism is problematic, the discourse remains strong in popular debate. This article responds to calls for sociological research on both ascriptions of NIMBYism and the use of deficit models. Through an analysis of interviews with key actors in the renewable energy industry, we explore the ways in which a discourse of NIMBYism is evident in their descriptions of local wind farm opponents. We conceptualize this discourse as embodying an array of deficit models of the public and public knowledge. This is significant not only because developers' constructions of publics inform their modes of engagement with them, but also because they may influence public responses themselves.
AB - UK energy policy contains ambitious goals for increased deployment of renewable energy technologies (RETs), but concern remains about the potential of local opposition to obstruct proposed developments. Despite emerging academic consensus that characterizing opposition to RET siting as NIMBYism is problematic, the discourse remains strong in popular debate. This article responds to calls for sociological research on both ascriptions of NIMBYism and the use of deficit models. Through an analysis of interviews with key actors in the renewable energy industry, we explore the ways in which a discourse of NIMBYism is evident in their descriptions of local wind farm opponents. We conceptualize this discourse as embodying an array of deficit models of the public and public knowledge. This is significant not only because developers' constructions of publics inform their modes of engagement with them, but also because they may influence public responses themselves.
KW - renewable energy technology
KW - deficit models
KW - wind farms
KW - siting disputes
KW - NIMBY
KW - RENEWABLE ENERGY
KW - SOCIAL GAP
KW - POWER
KW - SCIENCE
KW - MODEL
KW - UK
KW - IMPLEMENTATION
KW - TECHNOLOGIES
KW - ENGAGEMENT
KW - DISPOSAL
U2 - 10.1080/08941920.2014.933923
DO - 10.1080/08941920.2014.933923
M3 - Journal article
VL - 28
SP - 246
EP - 260
JO - Society and Natural Resources
JF - Society and Natural Resources
SN - 0894-1920
IS - 3
ER -