Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > An empirical test of a clinical metacognitive m...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

An empirical test of a clinical metacognitive model of rumination and depression.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

An empirical test of a clinical metacognitive model of rumination and depression. / Papageorgiou, Costas; Wells, A.
In: Cognitive Therapy and Research, Vol. 27, No. 3, 06.2003, p. 261-273.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Papageorgiou, C & Wells, A 2003, 'An empirical test of a clinical metacognitive model of rumination and depression.', Cognitive Therapy and Research, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023962332399

APA

Papageorgiou, C., & Wells, A. (2003). An empirical test of a clinical metacognitive model of rumination and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27(3), 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023962332399

Vancouver

Papageorgiou C, Wells A. An empirical test of a clinical metacognitive model of rumination and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2003 Jun;27(3):261-273. doi: 10.1023/A:1023962332399

Author

Papageorgiou, Costas ; Wells, A. / An empirical test of a clinical metacognitive model of rumination and depression. In: Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2003 ; Vol. 27, No. 3. pp. 261-273.

Bibtex

@article{11b295448adb420caba60f39a7729d72,
title = "An empirical test of a clinical metacognitive model of rumination and depression.",
abstract = "Rumination has attracted increasing theoretical and empirical interest in the past 15 years. Previous research has demonstrated significant relationships between rumination, depression, and metacognition. Two studies were conducted to further investigate these relationships and test the fit of a clinical metacognitive model of rumination and depression in samples of both depressed and nondepressed participants. In these studies, we collected cross-sectional data of rumination, depression, and metacognition. The relationships among variables were examined by testing the fit of structural equation models. In the study on depressed participants, a good model fit was obtained consistent with predictions. There were similarities and differences between the depressed and nondepressed samples in terms of relationships among metacognition, rumination, and depression. In each case, theoretically consistent paths between positive metacognitive beliefs, rumination, negative metacognitive beliefs, and depression were evident. The conceptual and clinical implications of these data are discussed.",
keywords = "depression - rumination - metacognition - cognitive processes",
author = "Costas Papageorgiou and A. Wells",
year = "2003",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1023/A:1023962332399",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "261--273",
journal = "Cognitive Therapy and Research",
issn = "0147-5916",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - An empirical test of a clinical metacognitive model of rumination and depression.

AU - Papageorgiou, Costas

AU - Wells, A.

PY - 2003/6

Y1 - 2003/6

N2 - Rumination has attracted increasing theoretical and empirical interest in the past 15 years. Previous research has demonstrated significant relationships between rumination, depression, and metacognition. Two studies were conducted to further investigate these relationships and test the fit of a clinical metacognitive model of rumination and depression in samples of both depressed and nondepressed participants. In these studies, we collected cross-sectional data of rumination, depression, and metacognition. The relationships among variables were examined by testing the fit of structural equation models. In the study on depressed participants, a good model fit was obtained consistent with predictions. There were similarities and differences between the depressed and nondepressed samples in terms of relationships among metacognition, rumination, and depression. In each case, theoretically consistent paths between positive metacognitive beliefs, rumination, negative metacognitive beliefs, and depression were evident. The conceptual and clinical implications of these data are discussed.

AB - Rumination has attracted increasing theoretical and empirical interest in the past 15 years. Previous research has demonstrated significant relationships between rumination, depression, and metacognition. Two studies were conducted to further investigate these relationships and test the fit of a clinical metacognitive model of rumination and depression in samples of both depressed and nondepressed participants. In these studies, we collected cross-sectional data of rumination, depression, and metacognition. The relationships among variables were examined by testing the fit of structural equation models. In the study on depressed participants, a good model fit was obtained consistent with predictions. There were similarities and differences between the depressed and nondepressed samples in terms of relationships among metacognition, rumination, and depression. In each case, theoretically consistent paths between positive metacognitive beliefs, rumination, negative metacognitive beliefs, and depression were evident. The conceptual and clinical implications of these data are discussed.

KW - depression - rumination - metacognition - cognitive processes

U2 - 10.1023/A:1023962332399

DO - 10.1023/A:1023962332399

M3 - Journal article

VL - 27

SP - 261

EP - 273

JO - Cognitive Therapy and Research

JF - Cognitive Therapy and Research

SN - 0147-5916

IS - 3

ER -