Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Applied Economics on 06/11/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00036846.2017.1397855
Accepted author manuscript, 251 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - An Explanation of Each-Way Wagers in Three Models Of Risky Choice
AU - Peel, David Alan
N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Applied Economics on 06/11/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00036846.2017.1397855
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - Punters may engage in betting on both a selection in an event to finish first or in one of the number of places, e.g. second, third or fourth. When the amounts staked with bookmakers at fixed odds on the win and place are equal, it is called an each-way bet. Each-way bets are apparently popular with punters but inconsistent with prominent models of wagering which assume gamblers are everywhere risk-seeking. In this note, we derive the conditions for win and place bets to be optimal in these three models of risky choice. The mathematical conditions for the each-way wager to be optimal, as opposed to a win and place wager with different stakes, are complicated and appear likely to occur rarely in practice. However, bettors obviously see the attraction in giving themselves two ways to bet on the one horse or two ways to win and betting each way. We suggest part of the ‘each-way’ betting attraction is that they are quick and easy to compute – a heuristic – to solve an otherwise complex betting strategy.
AB - Punters may engage in betting on both a selection in an event to finish first or in one of the number of places, e.g. second, third or fourth. When the amounts staked with bookmakers at fixed odds on the win and place are equal, it is called an each-way bet. Each-way bets are apparently popular with punters but inconsistent with prominent models of wagering which assume gamblers are everywhere risk-seeking. In this note, we derive the conditions for win and place bets to be optimal in these three models of risky choice. The mathematical conditions for the each-way wager to be optimal, as opposed to a win and place wager with different stakes, are complicated and appear likely to occur rarely in practice. However, bettors obviously see the attraction in giving themselves two ways to bet on the one horse or two ways to win and betting each way. We suggest part of the ‘each-way’ betting attraction is that they are quick and easy to compute – a heuristic – to solve an otherwise complex betting strategy.
KW - Each-way bets
KW - cumulative prospect theory
KW - rank-dependent utility
U2 - 10.1080/00036846.2017.1397855
DO - 10.1080/00036846.2017.1397855
M3 - Journal article
VL - 50
SP - 2431
EP - 2438
JO - Applied Economics
JF - Applied Economics
SN - 0003-6846
IS - 22
ER -