Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Analysis of electronic micro-payment market
View graph of relations

Analysis of electronic micro-payment market

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Analysis of electronic micro-payment market. / See-To, Eric W. K.; Jaisingh, Jeevan; Tam, Kar Yan.
In: Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2007, p. 63-83.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

See-To, EWK, Jaisingh, J & Tam, KY 2007, 'Analysis of electronic micro-payment market', Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 63-83.

APA

See-To, E. W. K., Jaisingh, J., & Tam, K. Y. (2007). Analysis of electronic micro-payment market. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 8(1), 63-83.

Vancouver

See-To EWK, Jaisingh J, Tam KY. Analysis of electronic micro-payment market. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research. 2007;8(1):63-83.

Author

See-To, Eric W. K. ; Jaisingh, Jeevan ; Tam, Kar Yan. / Analysis of electronic micro-payment market. In: Journal of Electronic Commerce Research. 2007 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 63-83.

Bibtex

@article{e0e10a43be994055894ebce174ae69c2,
title = "Analysis of electronic micro-payment market",
abstract = "Despite the potential of micro-payment systems very few systems have been successful. Little is known about the reasons behind the successful few and the failures of the majority. Micro-payment markets exhibit two-sided network effects and the underlying dynamics of these markets are not very well understood. Based on a stylized model of a two-sided market, we find that a 'survival mass' of merchants and consumers is required for a micro-payment system to exist and a 'critical mass' for the acceptance levels to take off and remain stable. We also find the non-intuitive result that lowering the consumer-side adoption cost will actually reduce the chances for the micro-payment market to develop. Thus, subsidization alone cannot create a micro-payment market. Anecdotal evidence supports this finding. When subsidization is needed, the consumer side will normally be subsidized. The two-sided market structure makes comparative analysis complex and non-trivial, rendering the implementation of micro-payment systems very difficult as indicated by the mixed results of a number of initiatives worldwide. ",
keywords = "Network effects, Two-sided market, Micro-payment systems, Smart card technology, electronic cash, Game theory",
author = "See-To, {Eric W. K.} and Jeevan Jaisingh and Tam, {Kar Yan}",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "63--83",
journal = "Journal of Electronic Commerce Research",
issn = "1938-9027",
publisher = "California State University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of electronic micro-payment market

AU - See-To, Eric W. K.

AU - Jaisingh, Jeevan

AU - Tam, Kar Yan

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Despite the potential of micro-payment systems very few systems have been successful. Little is known about the reasons behind the successful few and the failures of the majority. Micro-payment markets exhibit two-sided network effects and the underlying dynamics of these markets are not very well understood. Based on a stylized model of a two-sided market, we find that a 'survival mass' of merchants and consumers is required for a micro-payment system to exist and a 'critical mass' for the acceptance levels to take off and remain stable. We also find the non-intuitive result that lowering the consumer-side adoption cost will actually reduce the chances for the micro-payment market to develop. Thus, subsidization alone cannot create a micro-payment market. Anecdotal evidence supports this finding. When subsidization is needed, the consumer side will normally be subsidized. The two-sided market structure makes comparative analysis complex and non-trivial, rendering the implementation of micro-payment systems very difficult as indicated by the mixed results of a number of initiatives worldwide.

AB - Despite the potential of micro-payment systems very few systems have been successful. Little is known about the reasons behind the successful few and the failures of the majority. Micro-payment markets exhibit two-sided network effects and the underlying dynamics of these markets are not very well understood. Based on a stylized model of a two-sided market, we find that a 'survival mass' of merchants and consumers is required for a micro-payment system to exist and a 'critical mass' for the acceptance levels to take off and remain stable. We also find the non-intuitive result that lowering the consumer-side adoption cost will actually reduce the chances for the micro-payment market to develop. Thus, subsidization alone cannot create a micro-payment market. Anecdotal evidence supports this finding. When subsidization is needed, the consumer side will normally be subsidized. The two-sided market structure makes comparative analysis complex and non-trivial, rendering the implementation of micro-payment systems very difficult as indicated by the mixed results of a number of initiatives worldwide.

KW - Network effects

KW - Two-sided market

KW - Micro-payment systems

KW - Smart card technology

KW - electronic cash

KW - Game theory

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

SP - 63

EP - 83

JO - Journal of Electronic Commerce Research

JF - Journal of Electronic Commerce Research

SN - 1938-9027

IS - 1

ER -