Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Analyzing the quality of the expected value solution in stochastic programming
AU - Maggioni, Francesca
AU - Wallace, Stein W
PY - 2012/11
Y1 - 2012/11
N2 - Stochastic programs are usually hard to solve when applied to real-world problems; a common approach is to consider the simpler deterministic program in which random parameters are replaced by their expected values, with a loss in terms of quality of the solution. The Value of the Stochastic Solution—VSS—is normally used to measure the importance of using a stochastic model. But what if VSS is large, or expected to be large, but we cannot solve the relevant stochastic program? Shall we just give up? In this paper we investigate very simple methods for studying structural similarities and differences between the stochastic solution and its deterministic counterpart. The aim of the methods is to find out, even when VSS is large, if the deterministic solution carries useful information for the stochastic case. It turns out that a large VSS does not necessarily imply that the deterministic solution is useless for the stochastic setting. Measures of the structure and upgradeability of the deterministic solution such as the loss using the skeleton solution and the loss of upgrading the deterministic solution will be introduced and basic inequalities in relation to the standard VSS are presented and tested on different cases.
AB - Stochastic programs are usually hard to solve when applied to real-world problems; a common approach is to consider the simpler deterministic program in which random parameters are replaced by their expected values, with a loss in terms of quality of the solution. The Value of the Stochastic Solution—VSS—is normally used to measure the importance of using a stochastic model. But what if VSS is large, or expected to be large, but we cannot solve the relevant stochastic program? Shall we just give up? In this paper we investigate very simple methods for studying structural similarities and differences between the stochastic solution and its deterministic counterpart. The aim of the methods is to find out, even when VSS is large, if the deterministic solution carries useful information for the stochastic case. It turns out that a large VSS does not necessarily imply that the deterministic solution is useless for the stochastic setting. Measures of the structure and upgradeability of the deterministic solution such as the loss using the skeleton solution and the loss of upgrading the deterministic solution will be introduced and basic inequalities in relation to the standard VSS are presented and tested on different cases.
KW - Stochastic programming
KW - Expected value problem
KW - Value of stochastic solution
KW - Quality of deterministic solution
KW - Skeleton solution
KW - Upgradeability of deterministic solution
U2 - 10.1007/s10479-010-0807-x
DO - 10.1007/s10479-010-0807-x
M3 - Journal article
VL - 200
JO - Annals of Operations Research
JF - Annals of Operations Research
SN - 0254-5330
IS - 1
ER -