Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > 'Animals Under Man?': Margaret Gatty's 'Parable...

Electronic data

View graph of relations

'Animals Under Man?': Margaret Gatty's 'Parables from Nature'

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

'Animals Under Man?': Margaret Gatty's 'Parables from Nature'. / Cosslett, Anna.
In: Women's Writing, Vol. 10, No. 1, 03.2003, p. 137-152.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Cosslett, A 2003, ''Animals Under Man?': Margaret Gatty's 'Parables from Nature'', Women's Writing, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 137-152.

APA

Vancouver

Author

Cosslett, Anna. / 'Animals Under Man?': Margaret Gatty's 'Parables from Nature'. In: Women's Writing. 2003 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 137-152.

Bibtex

@article{bd220b2229fe4eb4bc28456ca381b23e,
title = "'Animals Under Man?': Margaret Gatty's 'Parables from Nature'",
abstract = "Margaret Gatty{\textquoteright}s Parables from Nature (1855-71) use the form of the moral tale for children to conduct a polemic against Tennysonian doubt, cleverly deploying the voices of talking animals and plants. The perspectives of animals, plants and children are valorised above those of arrogant male doubters. When this happens, the ironies Gatty uses can escape control, and lead to more subversive readings than the overt message, overturning the conventional hierarchies she has set up. The voices of the marginalised take over the centre, and comic inversion privileges the unprivileged, in a carnivalesque celebration of possibilities that terrify Tennyson, rather than the orthodox rebuttal of doubt called for by the feminine role. The article revalues Gatty{\textquoteright}s 'feminine' and {\textquoteleft}animal{\textquoteright}s-eye{\textquoteright} take on the problems about the natural world that exercise Tennyson and other canonical male writers, including Darwin and Hardy.",
author = "Anna Cosslett",
note = "The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Women's Writing, 10 (1), 2003, {\textcopyright} Informa Plc",
year = "2003",
month = mar,
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "137--152",
journal = "Women's Writing",
issn = "0969-9082",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Animals Under Man?': Margaret Gatty's 'Parables from Nature'

AU - Cosslett, Anna

N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Women's Writing, 10 (1), 2003, © Informa Plc

PY - 2003/3

Y1 - 2003/3

N2 - Margaret Gatty’s Parables from Nature (1855-71) use the form of the moral tale for children to conduct a polemic against Tennysonian doubt, cleverly deploying the voices of talking animals and plants. The perspectives of animals, plants and children are valorised above those of arrogant male doubters. When this happens, the ironies Gatty uses can escape control, and lead to more subversive readings than the overt message, overturning the conventional hierarchies she has set up. The voices of the marginalised take over the centre, and comic inversion privileges the unprivileged, in a carnivalesque celebration of possibilities that terrify Tennyson, rather than the orthodox rebuttal of doubt called for by the feminine role. The article revalues Gatty’s 'feminine' and ‘animal’s-eye’ take on the problems about the natural world that exercise Tennyson and other canonical male writers, including Darwin and Hardy.

AB - Margaret Gatty’s Parables from Nature (1855-71) use the form of the moral tale for children to conduct a polemic against Tennysonian doubt, cleverly deploying the voices of talking animals and plants. The perspectives of animals, plants and children are valorised above those of arrogant male doubters. When this happens, the ironies Gatty uses can escape control, and lead to more subversive readings than the overt message, overturning the conventional hierarchies she has set up. The voices of the marginalised take over the centre, and comic inversion privileges the unprivileged, in a carnivalesque celebration of possibilities that terrify Tennyson, rather than the orthodox rebuttal of doubt called for by the feminine role. The article revalues Gatty’s 'feminine' and ‘animal’s-eye’ take on the problems about the natural world that exercise Tennyson and other canonical male writers, including Darwin and Hardy.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

SP - 137

EP - 152

JO - Women's Writing

JF - Women's Writing

SN - 0969-9082

IS - 1

ER -