Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Anthropocene - a cautious welcome from environm...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Anthropocene - a cautious welcome from environmental sociology?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Anthropocene - a cautious welcome from environmental sociology? / Lidskog, Rolf; Waterton, Claire Frances Jane.
In: Environmental Sociology, Vol. 2, No. 4, 01.11.2016, p. 395-406.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Lidskog R, Waterton CFJ. Anthropocene - a cautious welcome from environmental sociology? Environmental Sociology. 2016 Nov 1;2(4):395-406. Epub 2016 Oct 3. doi: 10.1080/23251042.2016.1210841

Author

Bibtex

@article{d1d5a41025844672a0b4fc8262359efc,
title = "Anthropocene - a cautious welcome from environmental sociology?",
abstract = "This paper concerns the way in which environmental sociologists might approach the concept of {\textquoteleft}the Anthropocene{\textquoteright}. As our title suggests, we extend in the paper a cautious welcome to this concept. Such a stance – an openness to {\textquoteleft}natural{\textquoteright} accounts accompanied by cautionary tales – has a long history within environmental sociology. In the paper, we document how the concept of the Anthropocene presents environmental sociology with a global environmental narrative that supports many of its own modes of thought. The concept of the Anthropocene reinforces, for example, the value of scholarship scrutinising ontological relationality, political-economic change, inter-disciplinary collaboration and cause-effect dynamics. At the same time, contemporary narratives of the Anthropocene seem to pose challenges for environmental sociology. We suggest that these narratives open up a need to think carefully about issues of naturalisation, difference, knowledge, agency and justice. We suggest that environmental sociology needs to draw on the full repertoire of its discipline in order to establish a critical-constructive relation between its own ways of thinking and those that are currently prominent within the narrative of the Anthropocene.",
keywords = "Anthropocene, environmental sociology, narrative, environmental challenges, post-disciplinarity",
author = "Rolf Lidskog and Waterton, {Claire Frances Jane}",
year = "2016",
month = nov,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/23251042.2016.1210841",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "395--406",
journal = "Environmental Sociology",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anthropocene - a cautious welcome from environmental sociology?

AU - Lidskog, Rolf

AU - Waterton, Claire Frances Jane

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - This paper concerns the way in which environmental sociologists might approach the concept of ‘the Anthropocene’. As our title suggests, we extend in the paper a cautious welcome to this concept. Such a stance – an openness to ‘natural’ accounts accompanied by cautionary tales – has a long history within environmental sociology. In the paper, we document how the concept of the Anthropocene presents environmental sociology with a global environmental narrative that supports many of its own modes of thought. The concept of the Anthropocene reinforces, for example, the value of scholarship scrutinising ontological relationality, political-economic change, inter-disciplinary collaboration and cause-effect dynamics. At the same time, contemporary narratives of the Anthropocene seem to pose challenges for environmental sociology. We suggest that these narratives open up a need to think carefully about issues of naturalisation, difference, knowledge, agency and justice. We suggest that environmental sociology needs to draw on the full repertoire of its discipline in order to establish a critical-constructive relation between its own ways of thinking and those that are currently prominent within the narrative of the Anthropocene.

AB - This paper concerns the way in which environmental sociologists might approach the concept of ‘the Anthropocene’. As our title suggests, we extend in the paper a cautious welcome to this concept. Such a stance – an openness to ‘natural’ accounts accompanied by cautionary tales – has a long history within environmental sociology. In the paper, we document how the concept of the Anthropocene presents environmental sociology with a global environmental narrative that supports many of its own modes of thought. The concept of the Anthropocene reinforces, for example, the value of scholarship scrutinising ontological relationality, political-economic change, inter-disciplinary collaboration and cause-effect dynamics. At the same time, contemporary narratives of the Anthropocene seem to pose challenges for environmental sociology. We suggest that these narratives open up a need to think carefully about issues of naturalisation, difference, knowledge, agency and justice. We suggest that environmental sociology needs to draw on the full repertoire of its discipline in order to establish a critical-constructive relation between its own ways of thinking and those that are currently prominent within the narrative of the Anthropocene.

KW - Anthropocene

KW - environmental sociology

KW - narrative

KW - environmental challenges

KW - post-disciplinarity

U2 - 10.1080/23251042.2016.1210841

DO - 10.1080/23251042.2016.1210841

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2

SP - 395

EP - 406

JO - Environmental Sociology

JF - Environmental Sociology

IS - 4

ER -