Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Anthropocene Semiosis

Research

Associated organisational units

Electronic data

  • AnthropoceneSemiosis

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Dialogues in Human Geography, 7 (2), 2017, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Dialogues in Human Geography page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/DHG on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 161 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Anthropocene Semiosis

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Book/Film/Article review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>30/08/2017
<mark>Journal</mark>Dialogues in Human Geography
Issue number2
Volume7
Number of pages6
Pages (from-to)145-150
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

While affirming their more-than-human concerns, Ruddick (2015) proposes that there are limits to the capacity of relational ontologies to deal with the conflicting demands and extensive temporalities of the Anthropocene crisis. This commentary probes her alternative notions of a forcefulness and generativity that exceeds individuated bodies and of a semiosis that inheres in the workings of ecological and Earth systems.

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Dialogues in Human Geography, 7 (2), 2017, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Dialogues in Human Geography page: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/DHG on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/