Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Anthropogenic Water Withdrawals Modify Freshwat...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Anthropogenic Water Withdrawals Modify Freshwater Inorganic Carbon Fluxes across the United States

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Anthropogenic Water Withdrawals Modify Freshwater Inorganic Carbon Fluxes across the United States. / Flint, Elizabeth M.; Ascott, Matthew J.; Gooddy, Daren C. et al.
In: Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 59, No. 8, 04.03.2025, p. 3949-3960.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Flint EM, Ascott MJ, Gooddy DC, Stahl MO, Surridge BWJ. Anthropogenic Water Withdrawals Modify Freshwater Inorganic Carbon Fluxes across the United States. Environmental Science and Technology. 2025 Mar 4;59(8):3949-3960. Epub 2025 Feb 17. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c09426

Author

Flint, Elizabeth M. ; Ascott, Matthew J. ; Gooddy, Daren C. et al. / Anthropogenic Water Withdrawals Modify Freshwater Inorganic Carbon Fluxes across the United States. In: Environmental Science and Technology. 2025 ; Vol. 59, No. 8. pp. 3949-3960.

Bibtex

@article{15b48852edaf456590e6d4fd78261dcb,
title = "Anthropogenic Water Withdrawals Modify Freshwater Inorganic Carbon Fluxes across the United States",
abstract = "Quantifying inorganic carbon fluxes to and from freshwater environments is essential for the accurate determination of the total amount of carbon exported to both the atmosphere and oceans. However, understanding of how anthropogenic freshwater withdrawals perturb land-freshwater-ocean and freshwater-atmosphere inorganic carbon fluxes is limited. Using the United States (US) as an exemplar, we estimate that fresh surface water withdrawals across the country during the year 2015 resulted in a median gross dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) retention flux of 8.2 (uncertainty range: 6.7–9.9) Tg C yr–1, equivalent to 28.3% of the total export of DIC to the oceans from US rivers. The median gross retention flux due to fresh groundwater withdrawals was 6.9 (uncertainty range: 5.3–8.8) Tg C yr–1, over eight times the magnitude of the DIC flux to the oceans by US subterranean groundwater discharge. The degassing of CO2 supersaturated groundwater following withdrawal emitted 3.6 (uncertainty range: 2.2–5.5) Tg of CO2 yr–1, 112% larger than previous estimates. On a county level, these CO2 emissions exceeded CO2 emissions from major emitting facilities across 45% of US counties. Reported results and a data analysis framework have important implications for the accurate development of carbon budgets across the US and around the world.",
author = "Flint, {Elizabeth M.} and Ascott, {Matthew J.} and Gooddy, {Daren C.} and Stahl, {Mason O.} and Surridge, {Ben W. J.}",
year = "2025",
month = mar,
day = "4",
doi = "10.1021/acs.est.4c09426",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "3949--3960",
journal = "Environmental Science and Technology",
issn = "0013-936X",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anthropogenic Water Withdrawals Modify Freshwater Inorganic Carbon Fluxes across the United States

AU - Flint, Elizabeth M.

AU - Ascott, Matthew J.

AU - Gooddy, Daren C.

AU - Stahl, Mason O.

AU - Surridge, Ben W. J.

PY - 2025/3/4

Y1 - 2025/3/4

N2 - Quantifying inorganic carbon fluxes to and from freshwater environments is essential for the accurate determination of the total amount of carbon exported to both the atmosphere and oceans. However, understanding of how anthropogenic freshwater withdrawals perturb land-freshwater-ocean and freshwater-atmosphere inorganic carbon fluxes is limited. Using the United States (US) as an exemplar, we estimate that fresh surface water withdrawals across the country during the year 2015 resulted in a median gross dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) retention flux of 8.2 (uncertainty range: 6.7–9.9) Tg C yr–1, equivalent to 28.3% of the total export of DIC to the oceans from US rivers. The median gross retention flux due to fresh groundwater withdrawals was 6.9 (uncertainty range: 5.3–8.8) Tg C yr–1, over eight times the magnitude of the DIC flux to the oceans by US subterranean groundwater discharge. The degassing of CO2 supersaturated groundwater following withdrawal emitted 3.6 (uncertainty range: 2.2–5.5) Tg of CO2 yr–1, 112% larger than previous estimates. On a county level, these CO2 emissions exceeded CO2 emissions from major emitting facilities across 45% of US counties. Reported results and a data analysis framework have important implications for the accurate development of carbon budgets across the US and around the world.

AB - Quantifying inorganic carbon fluxes to and from freshwater environments is essential for the accurate determination of the total amount of carbon exported to both the atmosphere and oceans. However, understanding of how anthropogenic freshwater withdrawals perturb land-freshwater-ocean and freshwater-atmosphere inorganic carbon fluxes is limited. Using the United States (US) as an exemplar, we estimate that fresh surface water withdrawals across the country during the year 2015 resulted in a median gross dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) retention flux of 8.2 (uncertainty range: 6.7–9.9) Tg C yr–1, equivalent to 28.3% of the total export of DIC to the oceans from US rivers. The median gross retention flux due to fresh groundwater withdrawals was 6.9 (uncertainty range: 5.3–8.8) Tg C yr–1, over eight times the magnitude of the DIC flux to the oceans by US subterranean groundwater discharge. The degassing of CO2 supersaturated groundwater following withdrawal emitted 3.6 (uncertainty range: 2.2–5.5) Tg of CO2 yr–1, 112% larger than previous estimates. On a county level, these CO2 emissions exceeded CO2 emissions from major emitting facilities across 45% of US counties. Reported results and a data analysis framework have important implications for the accurate development of carbon budgets across the US and around the world.

U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.4c09426

DO - 10.1021/acs.est.4c09426

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 39960379

VL - 59

SP - 3949

EP - 3960

JO - Environmental Science and Technology

JF - Environmental Science and Technology

SN - 0013-936X

IS - 8

ER -