Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Application of imaging systems to characterizat...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Application of imaging systems to characterization of single-event effects in high-energy neutron environments

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Application of imaging systems to characterization of single-event effects in high-energy neutron environments. / Török, Z.; Platt, S. P.
In: IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Vol. 53, No. 6, 01.12.2006, p. 3718-3725.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Török Z, Platt SP. Application of imaging systems to characterization of single-event effects in high-energy neutron environments. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 2006 Dec 1;53(6):3718-3725. doi: 10.1109/TNS.2006.885005

Author

Török, Z. ; Platt, S. P. / Application of imaging systems to characterization of single-event effects in high-energy neutron environments. In: IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 2006 ; Vol. 53, No. 6. pp. 3718-3725.

Bibtex

@article{44d5b2cadfd64fab9ab8ca36cf400ea0,
title = "Application of imaging systems to characterization of single-event effects in high-energy neutron environments",
abstract = "We use charge-coupled devices (CCDs) to characterise the single-event effect (SEE) inducing properties of high-energy neutron beams, including the spatial distribution of induced charge. Three representative CCD types are evaluated for this purpose. We study the significance of anti-blooming structures and pixel size. Anti-blooming structures are found to suppress event rates and corrupt event statistics. Devices without such structures are preferred and anti-blooming correction is performed in software. A CCD with 9 μm pixels is chosen for an Imaging SEE Monitor, which is currently being deployed in a variety of natural and synthetic neutron fields. Comparison is made between effects observed in neutron beams at LANSCE and TRIUMF accelerator facilities. Cross-sections for all events at the two facilities agree, providing independent confirmation of dosimetry. Cross-sections for more intense events disagree, with about a factor of 5 difference (LANSCE more effective) at 1 pC deposited charge. We attribute this discrepancy to the harder neutron spectrum at LANSCE, and conclude that predictions of SEE cross-sections in devices of interest, as measured at the two facilities, are liable to differ for this reason. Predictions of SEE rates in the field may also be in doubt. Charge collection measurements are recommended for adoption in test protocols for accelerated testing for neutron SEE.",
keywords = "Charge coupled devices, Charge measurement, Dosimetry, Image analysis, Neutron beams, Neutron effects, Test facilities",
author = "Z. T{\"o}r{\"o}k and Platt, {S. P.}",
year = "2006",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/TNS.2006.885005",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "3718--3725",
journal = "IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science",
issn = "0018-9499",
publisher = "IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Application of imaging systems to characterization of single-event effects in high-energy neutron environments

AU - Török, Z.

AU - Platt, S. P.

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - We use charge-coupled devices (CCDs) to characterise the single-event effect (SEE) inducing properties of high-energy neutron beams, including the spatial distribution of induced charge. Three representative CCD types are evaluated for this purpose. We study the significance of anti-blooming structures and pixel size. Anti-blooming structures are found to suppress event rates and corrupt event statistics. Devices without such structures are preferred and anti-blooming correction is performed in software. A CCD with 9 μm pixels is chosen for an Imaging SEE Monitor, which is currently being deployed in a variety of natural and synthetic neutron fields. Comparison is made between effects observed in neutron beams at LANSCE and TRIUMF accelerator facilities. Cross-sections for all events at the two facilities agree, providing independent confirmation of dosimetry. Cross-sections for more intense events disagree, with about a factor of 5 difference (LANSCE more effective) at 1 pC deposited charge. We attribute this discrepancy to the harder neutron spectrum at LANSCE, and conclude that predictions of SEE cross-sections in devices of interest, as measured at the two facilities, are liable to differ for this reason. Predictions of SEE rates in the field may also be in doubt. Charge collection measurements are recommended for adoption in test protocols for accelerated testing for neutron SEE.

AB - We use charge-coupled devices (CCDs) to characterise the single-event effect (SEE) inducing properties of high-energy neutron beams, including the spatial distribution of induced charge. Three representative CCD types are evaluated for this purpose. We study the significance of anti-blooming structures and pixel size. Anti-blooming structures are found to suppress event rates and corrupt event statistics. Devices without such structures are preferred and anti-blooming correction is performed in software. A CCD with 9 μm pixels is chosen for an Imaging SEE Monitor, which is currently being deployed in a variety of natural and synthetic neutron fields. Comparison is made between effects observed in neutron beams at LANSCE and TRIUMF accelerator facilities. Cross-sections for all events at the two facilities agree, providing independent confirmation of dosimetry. Cross-sections for more intense events disagree, with about a factor of 5 difference (LANSCE more effective) at 1 pC deposited charge. We attribute this discrepancy to the harder neutron spectrum at LANSCE, and conclude that predictions of SEE cross-sections in devices of interest, as measured at the two facilities, are liable to differ for this reason. Predictions of SEE rates in the field may also be in doubt. Charge collection measurements are recommended for adoption in test protocols for accelerated testing for neutron SEE.

KW - Charge coupled devices

KW - Charge measurement

KW - Dosimetry

KW - Image analysis

KW - Neutron beams

KW - Neutron effects

KW - Test facilities

U2 - 10.1109/TNS.2006.885005

DO - 10.1109/TNS.2006.885005

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:33846294350

VL - 53

SP - 3718

EP - 3725

JO - IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science

JF - IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science

SN - 0018-9499

IS - 6

ER -