Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Appraising the evidence : reviewing disparate d...

Research

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Appraising the evidence : reviewing disparate data systematically.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Appraising the evidence : reviewing disparate data systematically. / Hawker, Sheila; Payne, Sheila; Kerr, Christine et al.
In: Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 12, No. 9, 11.2002, p. 1284-1299.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Hawker, S, Payne, S, Kerr, C, Hardey, M & Powell, J 2002, 'Appraising the evidence : reviewing disparate data systematically.', Qualitative Health Research, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1284-1299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302238251

APA

Hawker, S., Payne, S., Kerr, C., Hardey, M., & Powell, J. (2002). Appraising the evidence : reviewing disparate data systematically. Qualitative Health Research, 12(9), 1284-1299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302238251

Vancouver

Hawker S, Payne S, Kerr C, Hardey M, Powell J. Appraising the evidence : reviewing disparate data systematically. Qualitative Health Research. 2002 Nov;12(9):1284-1299. doi: 10.1177/1049732302238251

Author

Hawker, Sheila ; Payne, Sheila ; Kerr, Christine et al. / Appraising the evidence : reviewing disparate data systematically. In: Qualitative Health Research. 2002 ; Vol. 12, No. 9. pp. 1284-1299.

Bibtex

@article{628e1258c88a4a28b63416232b4df443,
title = "Appraising the evidence : reviewing disparate data systematically.",
abstract = "The authors describe a method of systematically reviewing research from different paradigms. They draw on the methods adapted, developed, and designed during a study concerned with the delivery of care across professional boundaries. Informed by the established method of systematic review, the authors undertook the review in distinct stages. They describe the methods developed for each stage and outline the difficulties encountered, the solutions devised, and the appraisal tools developed. Although many of the problems encountered were related to the critical assessment of qualitative research, the authors argue that the method of systematic review can be adapted for use with different data and across disciplines.",
author = "Sheila Hawker and Sheila Payne and Christine Kerr and Michael Hardey and Jackie Powell",
year = "2002",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1177/1049732302238251",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1284--1299",
journal = "Qualitative Health Research",
issn = "1552-7557",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Appraising the evidence : reviewing disparate data systematically.

AU - Hawker, Sheila

AU - Payne, Sheila

AU - Kerr, Christine

AU - Hardey, Michael

AU - Powell, Jackie

PY - 2002/11

Y1 - 2002/11

N2 - The authors describe a method of systematically reviewing research from different paradigms. They draw on the methods adapted, developed, and designed during a study concerned with the delivery of care across professional boundaries. Informed by the established method of systematic review, the authors undertook the review in distinct stages. They describe the methods developed for each stage and outline the difficulties encountered, the solutions devised, and the appraisal tools developed. Although many of the problems encountered were related to the critical assessment of qualitative research, the authors argue that the method of systematic review can be adapted for use with different data and across disciplines.

AB - The authors describe a method of systematically reviewing research from different paradigms. They draw on the methods adapted, developed, and designed during a study concerned with the delivery of care across professional boundaries. Informed by the established method of systematic review, the authors undertook the review in distinct stages. They describe the methods developed for each stage and outline the difficulties encountered, the solutions devised, and the appraisal tools developed. Although many of the problems encountered were related to the critical assessment of qualitative research, the authors argue that the method of systematic review can be adapted for use with different data and across disciplines.

U2 - 10.1177/1049732302238251

DO - 10.1177/1049732302238251

M3 - Journal article

VL - 12

SP - 1284

EP - 1299

JO - Qualitative Health Research

JF - Qualitative Health Research

SN - 1552-7557

IS - 9

ER -