Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Are brief alcohol interventions targeting alcoh...
View graph of relations

Are brief alcohol interventions targeting alcohol use efficacious in military and veteran populations?: A meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Are brief alcohol interventions targeting alcohol use efficacious in military and veteran populations? A meta-analysis. / Doherty, AM; Mason, C; Fear, NT et al.
In: Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Vol. 178, 01.09.2017, p. 571-578.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Doherty AM, Mason C, Fear NT, Rona R, Greenberg N, Goodwin L. Are brief alcohol interventions targeting alcohol use efficacious in military and veteran populations? A meta-analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2017 Sept 1;178:571-578. Epub 2017 Jul 25. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.029

Author

Doherty, AM ; Mason, C ; Fear, NT et al. / Are brief alcohol interventions targeting alcohol use efficacious in military and veteran populations? A meta-analysis. In: Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2017 ; Vol. 178. pp. 571-578.

Bibtex

@article{6a728b5dc4d744e7a6a31247980fba18,
title = "Are brief alcohol interventions targeting alcohol use efficacious in military and veteran populations?: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "BackgroundRates of hazardous and harm-related drinking are higher in the military and veteran populations compared to the general population. Brief alcohol interventions (BAIs) targeting alcohol use appear to reduce harmful drinking in the general population. However, less is known about the efficacy of BAIs targeting alcohol in military and veteran populations.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the type and efficacy of BAIs used to reduce alcohol use in military and veteran populations conducted from 2000 onwards. The meta-analysis was conducted using a standardised outcome measure of change in average weekly drinks (AWDs) from baseline to follow-up.ResultsThe search revealed 10 papers that met the search criteria, and that reported data on 11 interventions included in the systematic review. 8 papers (reporting on 9 different interventions) were included in the meta-analysis after 2 papers were excluded for which the relevant outcome data were not available. There was no overall effect of BAIs; a non-significant weekly drink reduction of 0.95 drinks was found (95% CI, −0.17 to 2.07). This lack of efficacy persisted regardless of military group (conscripts, serving or veterans) and method of delivery (i.e., face-to-face, web-based or written information). Furthermore, sensitivity analyses revealed this small drink reduction was driven mainly by a single study.ConclusionsBased on these findings, existing BAIs do not seem to be efficacious in reducing alcohol use in military populations, despite some encouraging results from one electronic intervention which was of extensive duration.",
author = "AM Doherty and C Mason and NT Fear and R Rona and N Greenberg and L Goodwin",
year = "2017",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.029",
language = "English",
volume = "178",
pages = "571--578",
journal = "Drug and Alcohol Dependence",
issn = "0376-8716",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are brief alcohol interventions targeting alcohol use efficacious in military and veteran populations?

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Doherty, AM

AU - Mason, C

AU - Fear, NT

AU - Rona, R

AU - Greenberg, N

AU - Goodwin, L

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - BackgroundRates of hazardous and harm-related drinking are higher in the military and veteran populations compared to the general population. Brief alcohol interventions (BAIs) targeting alcohol use appear to reduce harmful drinking in the general population. However, less is known about the efficacy of BAIs targeting alcohol in military and veteran populations.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the type and efficacy of BAIs used to reduce alcohol use in military and veteran populations conducted from 2000 onwards. The meta-analysis was conducted using a standardised outcome measure of change in average weekly drinks (AWDs) from baseline to follow-up.ResultsThe search revealed 10 papers that met the search criteria, and that reported data on 11 interventions included in the systematic review. 8 papers (reporting on 9 different interventions) were included in the meta-analysis after 2 papers were excluded for which the relevant outcome data were not available. There was no overall effect of BAIs; a non-significant weekly drink reduction of 0.95 drinks was found (95% CI, −0.17 to 2.07). This lack of efficacy persisted regardless of military group (conscripts, serving or veterans) and method of delivery (i.e., face-to-face, web-based or written information). Furthermore, sensitivity analyses revealed this small drink reduction was driven mainly by a single study.ConclusionsBased on these findings, existing BAIs do not seem to be efficacious in reducing alcohol use in military populations, despite some encouraging results from one electronic intervention which was of extensive duration.

AB - BackgroundRates of hazardous and harm-related drinking are higher in the military and veteran populations compared to the general population. Brief alcohol interventions (BAIs) targeting alcohol use appear to reduce harmful drinking in the general population. However, less is known about the efficacy of BAIs targeting alcohol in military and veteran populations.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the type and efficacy of BAIs used to reduce alcohol use in military and veteran populations conducted from 2000 onwards. The meta-analysis was conducted using a standardised outcome measure of change in average weekly drinks (AWDs) from baseline to follow-up.ResultsThe search revealed 10 papers that met the search criteria, and that reported data on 11 interventions included in the systematic review. 8 papers (reporting on 9 different interventions) were included in the meta-analysis after 2 papers were excluded for which the relevant outcome data were not available. There was no overall effect of BAIs; a non-significant weekly drink reduction of 0.95 drinks was found (95% CI, −0.17 to 2.07). This lack of efficacy persisted regardless of military group (conscripts, serving or veterans) and method of delivery (i.e., face-to-face, web-based or written information). Furthermore, sensitivity analyses revealed this small drink reduction was driven mainly by a single study.ConclusionsBased on these findings, existing BAIs do not seem to be efficacious in reducing alcohol use in military populations, despite some encouraging results from one electronic intervention which was of extensive duration.

U2 - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.029

DO - 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.029

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 28750345

VL - 178

SP - 571

EP - 578

JO - Drug and Alcohol Dependence

JF - Drug and Alcohol Dependence

SN - 0376-8716

ER -