Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Are They Really a New Species?

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Are They Really a New Species?: Exploring the Emergence of Social Entrepreneurs Through Giddens’s Structuration Theory

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Are They Really a New Species? Exploring the Emergence of Social Entrepreneurs Through Giddens’s Structuration Theory. / Steiner, Artur; Jack, Sarah; Farmer, Jane et al.
In: Business & Society, Vol. 61, No. 7, 01.09.2022, p. 1919-1961.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Steiner A, Jack S, Farmer J, Steinerowska-Streb I. Are They Really a New Species? Exploring the Emergence of Social Entrepreneurs Through Giddens’s Structuration Theory. Business & Society. 2022 Sept 1;61(7):1919-1961. Epub 2021 Nov 28. doi: 10.1177/00076503211053014

Author

Steiner, Artur ; Jack, Sarah ; Farmer, Jane et al. / Are They Really a New Species? Exploring the Emergence of Social Entrepreneurs Through Giddens’s Structuration Theory. In: Business & Society. 2022 ; Vol. 61, No. 7. pp. 1919-1961.

Bibtex

@article{5ce063bc6a7c41cf9ed84475d7ee628c,
title = "Are They Really a New Species?: Exploring the Emergence of Social Entrepreneurs Through Giddens{\textquoteright}s Structuration Theory",
abstract = "Using Giddens{\textquoteright}s structuration theory and empirical data from a study with social enterprise stakeholders, the article explores how social entrepreneurs and the structure co-create one another. We show that the development of the contemporary significance of social entrepreneurialism lies in a combination of complex context-specific structural forces and the activities of agents who initiate, demand, and impose change. Social entrepreneurs intentionally tackle social challenges, but their actions bring unintentional results, such as the transfer of state responsibilities onto communities. Direct outputs of their activities introduce indirect outcomes, bringing wider changes in culture and policy. The evolving nature of entrepreneurship and a number of factors that interplay in time and space, and enable and constrain social entrepreneurs, confirm the applicability of Giddens{\textquoteright}s theory in the field of social entrepreneurship. The originality of this article derives from revealing mechanisms that enable social entrepreneurs to emerge and reasons for structural change. We also build a “co-creation model of structure and agency” that can be used to “engineer” the process of social entrepreneurship.",
keywords = "agents, entrepreneurship, social entrepreneur, structuration theory",
author = "Artur Steiner and Sarah Jack and Jane Farmer and Izabella Steinerowska-Streb",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/00076503211053014",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "1919--1961",
journal = "Business & Society",
issn = "0007-6503",
publisher = "Sage",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are They Really a New Species?

T2 - Exploring the Emergence of Social Entrepreneurs Through Giddens’s Structuration Theory

AU - Steiner, Artur

AU - Jack, Sarah

AU - Farmer, Jane

AU - Steinerowska-Streb, Izabella

PY - 2022/9/1

Y1 - 2022/9/1

N2 - Using Giddens’s structuration theory and empirical data from a study with social enterprise stakeholders, the article explores how social entrepreneurs and the structure co-create one another. We show that the development of the contemporary significance of social entrepreneurialism lies in a combination of complex context-specific structural forces and the activities of agents who initiate, demand, and impose change. Social entrepreneurs intentionally tackle social challenges, but their actions bring unintentional results, such as the transfer of state responsibilities onto communities. Direct outputs of their activities introduce indirect outcomes, bringing wider changes in culture and policy. The evolving nature of entrepreneurship and a number of factors that interplay in time and space, and enable and constrain social entrepreneurs, confirm the applicability of Giddens’s theory in the field of social entrepreneurship. The originality of this article derives from revealing mechanisms that enable social entrepreneurs to emerge and reasons for structural change. We also build a “co-creation model of structure and agency” that can be used to “engineer” the process of social entrepreneurship.

AB - Using Giddens’s structuration theory and empirical data from a study with social enterprise stakeholders, the article explores how social entrepreneurs and the structure co-create one another. We show that the development of the contemporary significance of social entrepreneurialism lies in a combination of complex context-specific structural forces and the activities of agents who initiate, demand, and impose change. Social entrepreneurs intentionally tackle social challenges, but their actions bring unintentional results, such as the transfer of state responsibilities onto communities. Direct outputs of their activities introduce indirect outcomes, bringing wider changes in culture and policy. The evolving nature of entrepreneurship and a number of factors that interplay in time and space, and enable and constrain social entrepreneurs, confirm the applicability of Giddens’s theory in the field of social entrepreneurship. The originality of this article derives from revealing mechanisms that enable social entrepreneurs to emerge and reasons for structural change. We also build a “co-creation model of structure and agency” that can be used to “engineer” the process of social entrepreneurship.

KW - agents

KW - entrepreneurship

KW - social entrepreneur

KW - structuration theory

U2 - 10.1177/00076503211053014

DO - 10.1177/00076503211053014

M3 - Journal article

VL - 61

SP - 1919

EP - 1961

JO - Business & Society

JF - Business & Society

SN - 0007-6503

IS - 7

ER -