Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Are we modelling the right thing?
View graph of relations

Are we modelling the right thing?: the impact of incorrect problem specification in credit scoring

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Are we modelling the right thing? the impact of incorrect problem specification in credit scoring. / Finlay, S. M.
In: Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 36, No. 5, 07.2009, p. 9065-9071.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Finlay SM. Are we modelling the right thing? the impact of incorrect problem specification in credit scoring. Expert Systems with Applications. 2009 Jul;36(5):9065-9071. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.12.016

Author

Finlay, S. M. / Are we modelling the right thing? the impact of incorrect problem specification in credit scoring. In: Expert Systems with Applications. 2009 ; Vol. 36, No. 5. pp. 9065-9071.

Bibtex

@article{d924c5b21c654b06b245226e56bf92c4,
title = "Are we modelling the right thing?: the impact of incorrect problem specification in credit scoring",
abstract = "Classification and regression models are widely used by mainstream credit granting institutions to assess the risk of customer default. In practice, the objectives used to derive model parameters and the business objectives used to assess models differ. Models parameters are determined by minimising some function or error or by maximising likelihood, but performance is assessed using global measures such as the GINI coefficient, or the misclassification rate at a specific point in the score distribution. This paper seeks to determine the impact on performance that results from having different objectives for model construction and model assessment. To do this a genetic algorithm (GA) is utilized to generate linear scoring models that directly optimise business measures of interest. The performance of the GA models is then compared to those constructed using logistic and linear regression. Empirical results show that all models perform similarly well, suggesting that modelling and business objectives are well aligned.",
keywords = "credit scoring, Genetic algorithms, predictive analytics, consumer credit, retail banking",
author = "Finlay, {S. M.}",
year = "2009",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1016/j.eswa.2008.12.016",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "9065--9071",
journal = "Expert Systems with Applications",
issn = "0957-4174",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are we modelling the right thing?

T2 - the impact of incorrect problem specification in credit scoring

AU - Finlay, S. M.

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - Classification and regression models are widely used by mainstream credit granting institutions to assess the risk of customer default. In practice, the objectives used to derive model parameters and the business objectives used to assess models differ. Models parameters are determined by minimising some function or error or by maximising likelihood, but performance is assessed using global measures such as the GINI coefficient, or the misclassification rate at a specific point in the score distribution. This paper seeks to determine the impact on performance that results from having different objectives for model construction and model assessment. To do this a genetic algorithm (GA) is utilized to generate linear scoring models that directly optimise business measures of interest. The performance of the GA models is then compared to those constructed using logistic and linear regression. Empirical results show that all models perform similarly well, suggesting that modelling and business objectives are well aligned.

AB - Classification and regression models are widely used by mainstream credit granting institutions to assess the risk of customer default. In practice, the objectives used to derive model parameters and the business objectives used to assess models differ. Models parameters are determined by minimising some function or error or by maximising likelihood, but performance is assessed using global measures such as the GINI coefficient, or the misclassification rate at a specific point in the score distribution. This paper seeks to determine the impact on performance that results from having different objectives for model construction and model assessment. To do this a genetic algorithm (GA) is utilized to generate linear scoring models that directly optimise business measures of interest. The performance of the GA models is then compared to those constructed using logistic and linear regression. Empirical results show that all models perform similarly well, suggesting that modelling and business objectives are well aligned.

KW - credit scoring

KW - Genetic algorithms

KW - predictive analytics

KW - consumer credit

KW - retail banking

U2 - 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.12.016

DO - 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.12.016

M3 - Journal article

VL - 36

SP - 9065

EP - 9071

JO - Expert Systems with Applications

JF - Expert Systems with Applications

SN - 0957-4174

IS - 5

ER -