Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Argumentation for multi-party privacy management

Electronic data

  • aamas_workshop_2015-js-v4

    Accepted author manuscript, 437 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Links

View graph of relations

Argumentation for multi-party privacy management

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Published

Standard

Argumentation for multi-party privacy management. / Fogues, Ricard L.; Murukanniah, Pradeep; Such, Jose M. et al.
The Second International Workshop on Agents and CyberSecurity (ACySe). 2015. p. 3-6.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paperpeer-review

Harvard

Fogues, RL, Murukanniah, P, Such, JM, Espinosa, A, Garcia-Fornes, A & Singh, M 2015, Argumentation for multi-party privacy management. in The Second International Workshop on Agents and CyberSecurity (ACySe). pp. 3-6. <http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/staff/suchj/acyse2015-proceedings/ACySe2015_submission_Fogues.pdf>

APA

Fogues, R. L., Murukanniah, P., Such, J. M., Espinosa, A., Garcia-Fornes, A., & Singh, M. (2015). Argumentation for multi-party privacy management. In The Second International Workshop on Agents and CyberSecurity (ACySe) (pp. 3-6) http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/staff/suchj/acyse2015-proceedings/ACySe2015_submission_Fogues.pdf

Vancouver

Fogues RL, Murukanniah P, Such JM, Espinosa A, Garcia-Fornes A, Singh M. Argumentation for multi-party privacy management. In The Second International Workshop on Agents and CyberSecurity (ACySe). 2015. p. 3-6

Author

Fogues, Ricard L. ; Murukanniah, Pradeep ; Such, Jose M. et al. / Argumentation for multi-party privacy management. The Second International Workshop on Agents and CyberSecurity (ACySe). 2015. pp. 3-6

Bibtex

@inproceedings{cc36cbe959b64e929df9141fb2592de5,
title = "Argumentation for multi-party privacy management",
abstract = "Social network services enable users to share large quantities of private information. Often, the shared information concerns individuals who are members of the social network but did not upload the information to the service. In such situations, inappropriate sharing preferences can cause conflict and threaten users{\textquoteright} privacy. Since related studies suggest that users prefer to solve multi-party privacy conflicts through negotiation, we introduce a novel approach based on negotiation through arguments. In our approach, users propose privacy settings and support their proposals with logical arguments. The final decision is based on a settingsupported by sound arguments.",
author = "Fogues, {Ricard L.} and Pradeep Murukanniah and Such, {Jose M.} and Agustin Espinosa and Ana Garcia-Fornes and Munindar Singh",
year = "2015",
month = may,
language = "English",
pages = "3--6",
booktitle = "The Second International Workshop on Agents and CyberSecurity (ACySe)",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Argumentation for multi-party privacy management

AU - Fogues, Ricard L.

AU - Murukanniah, Pradeep

AU - Such, Jose M.

AU - Espinosa, Agustin

AU - Garcia-Fornes, Ana

AU - Singh, Munindar

PY - 2015/5

Y1 - 2015/5

N2 - Social network services enable users to share large quantities of private information. Often, the shared information concerns individuals who are members of the social network but did not upload the information to the service. In such situations, inappropriate sharing preferences can cause conflict and threaten users’ privacy. Since related studies suggest that users prefer to solve multi-party privacy conflicts through negotiation, we introduce a novel approach based on negotiation through arguments. In our approach, users propose privacy settings and support their proposals with logical arguments. The final decision is based on a settingsupported by sound arguments.

AB - Social network services enable users to share large quantities of private information. Often, the shared information concerns individuals who are members of the social network but did not upload the information to the service. In such situations, inappropriate sharing preferences can cause conflict and threaten users’ privacy. Since related studies suggest that users prefer to solve multi-party privacy conflicts through negotiation, we introduce a novel approach based on negotiation through arguments. In our approach, users propose privacy settings and support their proposals with logical arguments. The final decision is based on a settingsupported by sound arguments.

M3 - Conference contribution/Paper

SP - 3

EP - 6

BT - The Second International Workshop on Agents and CyberSecurity (ACySe)

ER -