Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Articulating scientific policy advice with PROTEE

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Articulating scientific policy advice with PROTEE

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Articulating scientific policy advice with PROTEE. / Valve, Helena; McNally, Ruth.
In: Science, Technology, and Human Values, Vol. 38, No. 4, 07.2013, p. 470-491.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Valve, H & McNally, R 2013, 'Articulating scientific policy advice with PROTEE', Science, Technology, and Human Values, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 470-491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912451340

APA

Valve, H., & McNally, R. (2013). Articulating scientific policy advice with PROTEE. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 38(4), 470-491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912451340

Vancouver

Valve H, McNally R. Articulating scientific policy advice with PROTEE. Science, Technology, and Human Values. 2013 Jul;38(4):470-491. Epub 2012 Jul 18. doi: 10.1177/0162243912451340

Author

Valve, Helena ; McNally, Ruth. / Articulating scientific policy advice with PROTEE. In: Science, Technology, and Human Values. 2013 ; Vol. 38, No. 4. pp. 470-491.

Bibtex

@article{9b836e316089410bbcc55693d9425f5b,
title = "Articulating scientific policy advice with PROTEE",
abstract = "Scientific knowledge is the outcome of a collective, for example, of experts, methods, equipment and experimental sites. The configuration of the collective shapes the scientific findings, allowing some interactions to become visible and meaningful at the expense of others. PROTEE is a methodology that aims to increase the reflexivity of research and innovation projects by helping to sensitise practitioners to the demarcations their projects enact, and to think through how these may affect the relevance of the outcomes. We used PROTEE to structure a series of dialogues with a research project that wanted its findings to make a contribution to the heated debate on transgenic trees. Through this process, the project did indeed become more articulated whilst we ourselves became engaged with the project in a very particular way, by becoming loyal to it. The dialogues also made the risks that engagement with public debate entails for scientists very apparent. Like us, the scientific project chose its loyalties, but what PROTEE did was to help to make these explicit. ",
keywords = "PROTEE, articulation, reflexivity, GM trees, scientific practice",
author = "Helena Valve and Ruth McNally",
year = "2013",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1177/0162243912451340",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "470--491",
journal = "Science, Technology, and Human Values",
issn = "0162-2439",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Articulating scientific policy advice with PROTEE

AU - Valve, Helena

AU - McNally, Ruth

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Scientific knowledge is the outcome of a collective, for example, of experts, methods, equipment and experimental sites. The configuration of the collective shapes the scientific findings, allowing some interactions to become visible and meaningful at the expense of others. PROTEE is a methodology that aims to increase the reflexivity of research and innovation projects by helping to sensitise practitioners to the demarcations their projects enact, and to think through how these may affect the relevance of the outcomes. We used PROTEE to structure a series of dialogues with a research project that wanted its findings to make a contribution to the heated debate on transgenic trees. Through this process, the project did indeed become more articulated whilst we ourselves became engaged with the project in a very particular way, by becoming loyal to it. The dialogues also made the risks that engagement with public debate entails for scientists very apparent. Like us, the scientific project chose its loyalties, but what PROTEE did was to help to make these explicit.

AB - Scientific knowledge is the outcome of a collective, for example, of experts, methods, equipment and experimental sites. The configuration of the collective shapes the scientific findings, allowing some interactions to become visible and meaningful at the expense of others. PROTEE is a methodology that aims to increase the reflexivity of research and innovation projects by helping to sensitise practitioners to the demarcations their projects enact, and to think through how these may affect the relevance of the outcomes. We used PROTEE to structure a series of dialogues with a research project that wanted its findings to make a contribution to the heated debate on transgenic trees. Through this process, the project did indeed become more articulated whilst we ourselves became engaged with the project in a very particular way, by becoming loyal to it. The dialogues also made the risks that engagement with public debate entails for scientists very apparent. Like us, the scientific project chose its loyalties, but what PROTEE did was to help to make these explicit.

KW - PROTEE

KW - articulation

KW - reflexivity

KW - GM trees

KW - scientific practice

U2 - 10.1177/0162243912451340

DO - 10.1177/0162243912451340

M3 - Journal article

VL - 38

SP - 470

EP - 491

JO - Science, Technology, and Human Values

JF - Science, Technology, and Human Values

SN - 0162-2439

IS - 4

ER -