Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Assembling life history narratives from quantit...

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • Assembling_life_history_narratives_from_quantitative_longitudinal_panel_data

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Social Research Methodology on 24/01/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13645579.2017.1279915

    Accepted author manuscript, 490 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License


Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Assembling life history narratives from quantitative longitudinal panel data: what’s the story for families using social work?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

  • Elaine Sharland
  • Paula Jane Holland
  • Morag Henderson
  • Meng Le Zhang
  • Sin Yi Cheung
  • Jonathan Scourfield
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/11/2017
<mark>Journal</mark>International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Issue number6
Number of pages13
Pages (from-to)667-679
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date24/01/17
<mark>Original language</mark>English


Embedded within quantitative longitudinal panel or cohort studies is narrative potential that is arguably untapped but might enrich our understanding of individual and social lives across time. This paper discusses a methodology to assemble the life history narratives of families using social work by drawing on quantitative data from the British Household Panel Survey. It explores whether this person-centred approach helps us to understand the counter-intuitive results of a parallel multivariate analyses, which suggest that families using social work fare worse than similar others over time. Our findings are tentative, due to the experimental use of this narrative method and the limits of social work information in the data-set. Nonetheless, the life histories presented bring to light complexities, diversity and the non-linear pathways between families’ needs, support and outcomes that the aggregates obscure. We conclude that reconstructing families’ lives in this way, especially in the absence of complementary longitudinal qualitative data, affords the wider opportunity to interrogate and better understand the findings of quantitative longitudinal studies.