Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Assessing the implicit beliefs of sexual offend...
View graph of relations

Assessing the implicit beliefs of sexual offenders using the implicit relational assessment procedure.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Assessing the implicit beliefs of sexual offenders using the implicit relational assessment procedure. / Dawson, David L.; Barnes-Holmes, Dermot; Gresswell, David M. et al.
In: Sexual Abuse, Vol. 21, No. 1, 03.2009, p. 57-75.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Dawson, DL, Barnes-Holmes, D, Gresswell, DM, Hart, AJ & Gore, NJ 2009, 'Assessing the implicit beliefs of sexual offenders using the implicit relational assessment procedure.', Sexual Abuse, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063208326928

APA

Dawson, D. L., Barnes-Holmes, D., Gresswell, D. M., Hart, A. J., & Gore, N. J. (2009). Assessing the implicit beliefs of sexual offenders using the implicit relational assessment procedure. Sexual Abuse, 21(1), 57-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063208326928

Vancouver

Dawson DL, Barnes-Holmes D, Gresswell DM, Hart AJ, Gore NJ. Assessing the implicit beliefs of sexual offenders using the implicit relational assessment procedure. Sexual Abuse. 2009 Mar;21(1):57-75. doi: 10.1177/1079063208326928

Author

Dawson, David L. ; Barnes-Holmes, Dermot ; Gresswell, David M. et al. / Assessing the implicit beliefs of sexual offenders using the implicit relational assessment procedure. In: Sexual Abuse. 2009 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 57-75.

Bibtex

@article{fc7c112ab20340f9b2118f8d36b6616b,
title = "Assessing the implicit beliefs of sexual offenders using the implicit relational assessment procedure.",
abstract = "Researchers have proposed that the cognitive distortions of sexual offenders are underpinned by a number of implicit cognitive processes termed implicit theories. Until recently, however, the implicit theory hypothesis has received little empirical support due to broader limitations with standard forensic assessment procedures. The current research aimed to determine whether a new assessment methodology, the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP), could provide further evidence for Ward and Keenan's (1999) children as sexual beings implicit theory. The results indicated that the IRAP was significantly more effective at identifying core implicit differences between sexual offenders against children and nonoffenders than a cognitive distortion questionnaire. Furthermore, although both groups demonstrated an overall response bias towards adults as sexual and children as nonsexual, this bias was significantly impaired in the sexual offender group. The findings are discussed in relation to previous implicit theory research and recommendations for the development of implicit methodologies are made.",
keywords = "implicit beliefs cognitive distortions sexual offending Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure",
author = "Dawson, {David L.} and Dermot Barnes-Holmes and Gresswell, {David M.} and Hart, {Aidan J.} and Gore, {Nick J.}",
note = "PG Intake 2004",
year = "2009",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1177/1079063208326928",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "57--75",
journal = "Sexual Abuse",
issn = "1079-0632",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the implicit beliefs of sexual offenders using the implicit relational assessment procedure.

AU - Dawson, David L.

AU - Barnes-Holmes, Dermot

AU - Gresswell, David M.

AU - Hart, Aidan J.

AU - Gore, Nick J.

N1 - PG Intake 2004

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - Researchers have proposed that the cognitive distortions of sexual offenders are underpinned by a number of implicit cognitive processes termed implicit theories. Until recently, however, the implicit theory hypothesis has received little empirical support due to broader limitations with standard forensic assessment procedures. The current research aimed to determine whether a new assessment methodology, the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP), could provide further evidence for Ward and Keenan's (1999) children as sexual beings implicit theory. The results indicated that the IRAP was significantly more effective at identifying core implicit differences between sexual offenders against children and nonoffenders than a cognitive distortion questionnaire. Furthermore, although both groups demonstrated an overall response bias towards adults as sexual and children as nonsexual, this bias was significantly impaired in the sexual offender group. The findings are discussed in relation to previous implicit theory research and recommendations for the development of implicit methodologies are made.

AB - Researchers have proposed that the cognitive distortions of sexual offenders are underpinned by a number of implicit cognitive processes termed implicit theories. Until recently, however, the implicit theory hypothesis has received little empirical support due to broader limitations with standard forensic assessment procedures. The current research aimed to determine whether a new assessment methodology, the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP), could provide further evidence for Ward and Keenan's (1999) children as sexual beings implicit theory. The results indicated that the IRAP was significantly more effective at identifying core implicit differences between sexual offenders against children and nonoffenders than a cognitive distortion questionnaire. Furthermore, although both groups demonstrated an overall response bias towards adults as sexual and children as nonsexual, this bias was significantly impaired in the sexual offender group. The findings are discussed in relation to previous implicit theory research and recommendations for the development of implicit methodologies are made.

KW - implicit beliefs cognitive distortions sexual offending Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure

U2 - 10.1177/1079063208326928

DO - 10.1177/1079063208326928

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 57

EP - 75

JO - Sexual Abuse

JF - Sexual Abuse

SN - 1079-0632

IS - 1

ER -