Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Assessment
View graph of relations

Assessment: a critical perspective

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Assessment: a critical perspective. / Reynolds, Michael; Trehan, Kiran.
In: Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2000, p. 267-278.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Reynolds, M & Trehan, K 2000, 'Assessment: a critical perspective', Studies in Higher Education, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 267-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070050193406

APA

Reynolds, M., & Trehan, K. (2000). Assessment: a critical perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 267-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070050193406

Vancouver

Reynolds M, Trehan K. Assessment: a critical perspective. Studies in Higher Education. 2000;25(3):267-278. doi: 10.1080/03075070050193406

Author

Reynolds, Michael ; Trehan, Kiran. / Assessment : a critical perspective. In: Studies in Higher Education. 2000 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 267-278.

Bibtex

@article{edcec718e3c54451b2cfb20155bd9a5f,
title = "Assessment: a critical perspective",
abstract = "The article draws attention to the anomaly that alternative approaches to assessment are not more evident in critical pedagogies. Using critical versions of management education as an illustration, the authors point out that there is little examination of the assessment procedure, let alone any replacement of it by less hierarchical methods. Drawing on students' experiences of participative assessment, the authors also illustrate some of the social processes involved and question the implicit assumption that such practices necessarily bring about equality. Differences within student groups influence power relations, which in turn are likely to affect the process of assessment and its outcome. While supporting the aims of participative assessment, particularly as an element of critical pedagogy, the article emphasises the need to take account of the complexities involved and ends with a discussion of implications for the role of tutors.",
author = "Michael Reynolds and Kiran Trehan",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1080/03075070050193406",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "267--278",
journal = "Studies in Higher Education",
issn = "0307-5079",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment

T2 - a critical perspective

AU - Reynolds, Michael

AU - Trehan, Kiran

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The article draws attention to the anomaly that alternative approaches to assessment are not more evident in critical pedagogies. Using critical versions of management education as an illustration, the authors point out that there is little examination of the assessment procedure, let alone any replacement of it by less hierarchical methods. Drawing on students' experiences of participative assessment, the authors also illustrate some of the social processes involved and question the implicit assumption that such practices necessarily bring about equality. Differences within student groups influence power relations, which in turn are likely to affect the process of assessment and its outcome. While supporting the aims of participative assessment, particularly as an element of critical pedagogy, the article emphasises the need to take account of the complexities involved and ends with a discussion of implications for the role of tutors.

AB - The article draws attention to the anomaly that alternative approaches to assessment are not more evident in critical pedagogies. Using critical versions of management education as an illustration, the authors point out that there is little examination of the assessment procedure, let alone any replacement of it by less hierarchical methods. Drawing on students' experiences of participative assessment, the authors also illustrate some of the social processes involved and question the implicit assumption that such practices necessarily bring about equality. Differences within student groups influence power relations, which in turn are likely to affect the process of assessment and its outcome. While supporting the aims of participative assessment, particularly as an element of critical pedagogy, the article emphasises the need to take account of the complexities involved and ends with a discussion of implications for the role of tutors.

U2 - 10.1080/03075070050193406

DO - 10.1080/03075070050193406

M3 - Journal article

VL - 25

SP - 267

EP - 278

JO - Studies in Higher Education

JF - Studies in Higher Education

SN - 0307-5079

IS - 3

ER -