Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Balancing polarities

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Balancing polarities: Developing a new framework for welfare research

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Published

Standard

Balancing polarities: Developing a new framework for welfare research. / Popay, Jennie; Williams, Fiona.
Welfare Research: A Critical Review. Taylor and Francis, 2005. p. 162-190.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Harvard

Popay, J & Williams, F 2005, Balancing polarities: Developing a new framework for welfare research. in Welfare Research: A Critical Review. Taylor and Francis, pp. 162-190. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203979365-19

APA

Popay, J., & Williams, F. (2005). Balancing polarities: Developing a new framework for welfare research. In Welfare Research: A Critical Review (pp. 162-190). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203979365-19

Vancouver

Popay J, Williams F. Balancing polarities: Developing a new framework for welfare research. In Welfare Research: A Critical Review. Taylor and Francis. 2005. p. 162-190 doi: 10.4324/9780203979365-19

Author

Popay, Jennie ; Williams, Fiona. / Balancing polarities : Developing a new framework for welfare research. Welfare Research: A Critical Review. Taylor and Francis, 2005. pp. 162-190

Bibtex

@inbook{9b80033b4d864c9c9ca333fe3f2d3259,
title = "Balancing polarities: Developing a new framework for welfare research",
abstract = "Reviewing Harold Wilsons account of the 1964-70 labour government, E.P.Thomson commented that {"}the book starts badly but it gets a great deal worse as it goes on{"} (Thomson 1971:50). Damning criticism indeed. Hopefully external judgements on this book will not be quite so withering! Our own view, as editors, is that the book started by highlighting some of the tensions and dichotomies that currently characterize theory and practice in welfare research and this complexity has deepened as the book has unfolded. In this final chapter we therefore highlight those elements of the complex terrain traversed in earlier chapters that we consider to be most salient to our pursuit of a new, less dichotomized framework for welfare research. In the second section we consider some existing concepts which might help to mediate between these tensions and dichotomies. In the course of doing this, we also point to dimensions of theoretical adequacy which could inform a new paradigm for welfare research. In the third and last section Fiona Williams begins to sketch out a framework for this new paradigm.",
author = "Jennie Popay and Fiona Williams",
year = "2005",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9780203979365-19",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781857282696",
pages = "162--190",
booktitle = "Welfare Research",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Balancing polarities

T2 - Developing a new framework for welfare research

AU - Popay, Jennie

AU - Williams, Fiona

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - Reviewing Harold Wilsons account of the 1964-70 labour government, E.P.Thomson commented that "the book starts badly but it gets a great deal worse as it goes on" (Thomson 1971:50). Damning criticism indeed. Hopefully external judgements on this book will not be quite so withering! Our own view, as editors, is that the book started by highlighting some of the tensions and dichotomies that currently characterize theory and practice in welfare research and this complexity has deepened as the book has unfolded. In this final chapter we therefore highlight those elements of the complex terrain traversed in earlier chapters that we consider to be most salient to our pursuit of a new, less dichotomized framework for welfare research. In the second section we consider some existing concepts which might help to mediate between these tensions and dichotomies. In the course of doing this, we also point to dimensions of theoretical adequacy which could inform a new paradigm for welfare research. In the third and last section Fiona Williams begins to sketch out a framework for this new paradigm.

AB - Reviewing Harold Wilsons account of the 1964-70 labour government, E.P.Thomson commented that "the book starts badly but it gets a great deal worse as it goes on" (Thomson 1971:50). Damning criticism indeed. Hopefully external judgements on this book will not be quite so withering! Our own view, as editors, is that the book started by highlighting some of the tensions and dichotomies that currently characterize theory and practice in welfare research and this complexity has deepened as the book has unfolded. In this final chapter we therefore highlight those elements of the complex terrain traversed in earlier chapters that we consider to be most salient to our pursuit of a new, less dichotomized framework for welfare research. In the second section we consider some existing concepts which might help to mediate between these tensions and dichotomies. In the course of doing this, we also point to dimensions of theoretical adequacy which could inform a new paradigm for welfare research. In the third and last section Fiona Williams begins to sketch out a framework for this new paradigm.

U2 - 10.4324/9780203979365-19

DO - 10.4324/9780203979365-19

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85070983253

SN - 9781857282696

SP - 162

EP - 190

BT - Welfare Research

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -