Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Banking on Trust

Electronic data

  • 2024ChanPhD

    Final published version, 2.03 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Banking on Trust: Historical Perspectives on Changes and Continuities in the Strategies of Rebuilding Corporate Legitimacy in British Joint-Stock Banks, c. 1830s-60s

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Published

Standard

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@phdthesis{2145b8c1bf084dd2a64f2f40cc0b3799,
title = "Banking on Trust: Historical Perspectives on Changes and Continuities in the Strategies of Rebuilding Corporate Legitimacy in British Joint-Stock Banks, c. 1830s-60s",
abstract = "This thesis uses the organisational trust repair model developed by Gillespie and Dietz to examine how effectively selected joint-stock banks from Northwest England rebuilt corporate legitimacy amidst periodic commercial crises in the nineteenth century. Given organisational complexity and exposure to shifting market sentiments, this thesis focuses on how bank directors simultaneously managed trust and distrust in a hostile environment, in which different parties were prone to distrust just as much as they were to trust. By exploring various approaches to repairing organisational trust across different banking institutions, this thesis argues that successful trust repair requires one to understand how trust was damaged in the first place, because different violations require distinct reparative responses as conditioned by varying circumstances. Following the belief that organisational legitimacy is a generalised perception among stakeholders that corporate actions are aligned with social norms and values, the research applies a cultural narrative approach to demonstrate how the interplay of socio-cultural factors drove the dynamics of trust repair. For this purpose, it uses different cultural sources, official papers, and archival materials to reconstruct the nineteenth-century contexts in which banking companies sought to repair trust. This thesis also argues that the dynamics of trust repair were essentially compounded by four key features of banking, namely: (1) information and power asymmetry between management and stakeholders; (2) competing expectations from different stakeholder groups; (3) the delicate balance between returns and risks from financial investment, and (4) the interconnectedness of banking institutions and the real economy. Through the combination of a contemporary theoretical framework with the historical contexts, the thesis aims to present the case for (1) understanding the past through the perspectives of management scholars in the twenty-first century, and (2) assessing the applicability of modern trust repair strategies in relation to historical patterns and practices.",
keywords = "Victorian Britain; joint-stock banks; banking crisis; trust repair; stakeholders",
author = "Alvin Chan",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2498",
language = "English",
publisher = "Lancaster University",
school = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Banking on Trust

T2 - Historical Perspectives on Changes and Continuities in the Strategies of Rebuilding Corporate Legitimacy in British Joint-Stock Banks, c. 1830s-60s

AU - Chan, Alvin

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - This thesis uses the organisational trust repair model developed by Gillespie and Dietz to examine how effectively selected joint-stock banks from Northwest England rebuilt corporate legitimacy amidst periodic commercial crises in the nineteenth century. Given organisational complexity and exposure to shifting market sentiments, this thesis focuses on how bank directors simultaneously managed trust and distrust in a hostile environment, in which different parties were prone to distrust just as much as they were to trust. By exploring various approaches to repairing organisational trust across different banking institutions, this thesis argues that successful trust repair requires one to understand how trust was damaged in the first place, because different violations require distinct reparative responses as conditioned by varying circumstances. Following the belief that organisational legitimacy is a generalised perception among stakeholders that corporate actions are aligned with social norms and values, the research applies a cultural narrative approach to demonstrate how the interplay of socio-cultural factors drove the dynamics of trust repair. For this purpose, it uses different cultural sources, official papers, and archival materials to reconstruct the nineteenth-century contexts in which banking companies sought to repair trust. This thesis also argues that the dynamics of trust repair were essentially compounded by four key features of banking, namely: (1) information and power asymmetry between management and stakeholders; (2) competing expectations from different stakeholder groups; (3) the delicate balance between returns and risks from financial investment, and (4) the interconnectedness of banking institutions and the real economy. Through the combination of a contemporary theoretical framework with the historical contexts, the thesis aims to present the case for (1) understanding the past through the perspectives of management scholars in the twenty-first century, and (2) assessing the applicability of modern trust repair strategies in relation to historical patterns and practices.

AB - This thesis uses the organisational trust repair model developed by Gillespie and Dietz to examine how effectively selected joint-stock banks from Northwest England rebuilt corporate legitimacy amidst periodic commercial crises in the nineteenth century. Given organisational complexity and exposure to shifting market sentiments, this thesis focuses on how bank directors simultaneously managed trust and distrust in a hostile environment, in which different parties were prone to distrust just as much as they were to trust. By exploring various approaches to repairing organisational trust across different banking institutions, this thesis argues that successful trust repair requires one to understand how trust was damaged in the first place, because different violations require distinct reparative responses as conditioned by varying circumstances. Following the belief that organisational legitimacy is a generalised perception among stakeholders that corporate actions are aligned with social norms and values, the research applies a cultural narrative approach to demonstrate how the interplay of socio-cultural factors drove the dynamics of trust repair. For this purpose, it uses different cultural sources, official papers, and archival materials to reconstruct the nineteenth-century contexts in which banking companies sought to repair trust. This thesis also argues that the dynamics of trust repair were essentially compounded by four key features of banking, namely: (1) information and power asymmetry between management and stakeholders; (2) competing expectations from different stakeholder groups; (3) the delicate balance between returns and risks from financial investment, and (4) the interconnectedness of banking institutions and the real economy. Through the combination of a contemporary theoretical framework with the historical contexts, the thesis aims to present the case for (1) understanding the past through the perspectives of management scholars in the twenty-first century, and (2) assessing the applicability of modern trust repair strategies in relation to historical patterns and practices.

KW - Victorian Britain; joint-stock banks; banking crisis; trust repair; stakeholders

U2 - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2498

DO - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2498

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

PB - Lancaster University

ER -