Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Bayesian uncertainty estimation methodology app...
View graph of relations

Bayesian uncertainty estimation methodology applied to air pollution modelling.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Bayesian uncertainty estimation methodology applied to air pollution modelling. / Romanowicz, Renata; Higson, Helen; Teasdale, Ian.
In: Environmetrics, Vol. 11, No. 3, 05.2000, p. 351-371.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Romanowicz R, Higson H, Teasdale I. Bayesian uncertainty estimation methodology applied to air pollution modelling. Environmetrics. 2000 May;11(3):351-371. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-095X(200005/06)11:3<351::AID-ENV424>3.0.CO;2-Z

Author

Romanowicz, Renata ; Higson, Helen ; Teasdale, Ian. / Bayesian uncertainty estimation methodology applied to air pollution modelling. In: Environmetrics. 2000 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 351-371.

Bibtex

@article{f4a5aef10ac0406f8e0c4c94e23f9ab8,
title = "Bayesian uncertainty estimation methodology applied to air pollution modelling.",
abstract = "The aim of the study is an uncertainty analysis of an air dispersion model. The model used is described in NRPB-R91 (Clarke, 1979), a model for short and medium range dispersion of radionuclides released into the atmosphere. Uncertainties in the model predictions arise both from the uncertainty of the input variables and the model simplifications, resulting in parameter uncertainty. The uncertainty of the predictions is well described by the credibility intervals of the predictions (prediction limits), which in turn are derived from the distribution of the predictions. The methodology for estimating this distribution consists of running multiple simulations of the model for discrete values of input parameters following some assumed random distributions. The value of the prediction limits lies in their objectivity. However, they depend on the assumed input distributions and their ranges (as do the model results). Hence the choice of distributions is very important for the reliability of the uncertainty analysis. In this work, the choice of input distributions is analysed from the point of view of the reliability of the predictive uncertainty of the model. An analysis of the influence of different assumptions regarding model input parameters is performed. Of the parameters investigated (i.e. roughness length, release height, wind fluctuation coefficient and wind speed), the model showed the greatest sensitivity to wind speed values. A major influence on the results of the stability condition specification is also demonstrated.",
keywords = "Gaussian air dispersion model, sensitivity analysis, Bayesian uncertainty estimation, likelihood functions, prior and posterior probability density functions, prediction errors, prediction limits",
author = "Renata Romanowicz and Helen Higson and Ian Teasdale",
year = "2000",
month = may,
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1099-095X(200005/06)11:3<351::AID-ENV424>3.0.CO;2-Z",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "351--371",
journal = "Environmetrics",
issn = "1099-095X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bayesian uncertainty estimation methodology applied to air pollution modelling.

AU - Romanowicz, Renata

AU - Higson, Helen

AU - Teasdale, Ian

PY - 2000/5

Y1 - 2000/5

N2 - The aim of the study is an uncertainty analysis of an air dispersion model. The model used is described in NRPB-R91 (Clarke, 1979), a model for short and medium range dispersion of radionuclides released into the atmosphere. Uncertainties in the model predictions arise both from the uncertainty of the input variables and the model simplifications, resulting in parameter uncertainty. The uncertainty of the predictions is well described by the credibility intervals of the predictions (prediction limits), which in turn are derived from the distribution of the predictions. The methodology for estimating this distribution consists of running multiple simulations of the model for discrete values of input parameters following some assumed random distributions. The value of the prediction limits lies in their objectivity. However, they depend on the assumed input distributions and their ranges (as do the model results). Hence the choice of distributions is very important for the reliability of the uncertainty analysis. In this work, the choice of input distributions is analysed from the point of view of the reliability of the predictive uncertainty of the model. An analysis of the influence of different assumptions regarding model input parameters is performed. Of the parameters investigated (i.e. roughness length, release height, wind fluctuation coefficient and wind speed), the model showed the greatest sensitivity to wind speed values. A major influence on the results of the stability condition specification is also demonstrated.

AB - The aim of the study is an uncertainty analysis of an air dispersion model. The model used is described in NRPB-R91 (Clarke, 1979), a model for short and medium range dispersion of radionuclides released into the atmosphere. Uncertainties in the model predictions arise both from the uncertainty of the input variables and the model simplifications, resulting in parameter uncertainty. The uncertainty of the predictions is well described by the credibility intervals of the predictions (prediction limits), which in turn are derived from the distribution of the predictions. The methodology for estimating this distribution consists of running multiple simulations of the model for discrete values of input parameters following some assumed random distributions. The value of the prediction limits lies in their objectivity. However, they depend on the assumed input distributions and their ranges (as do the model results). Hence the choice of distributions is very important for the reliability of the uncertainty analysis. In this work, the choice of input distributions is analysed from the point of view of the reliability of the predictive uncertainty of the model. An analysis of the influence of different assumptions regarding model input parameters is performed. Of the parameters investigated (i.e. roughness length, release height, wind fluctuation coefficient and wind speed), the model showed the greatest sensitivity to wind speed values. A major influence on the results of the stability condition specification is also demonstrated.

KW - Gaussian air dispersion model

KW - sensitivity analysis

KW - Bayesian uncertainty estimation

KW - likelihood functions

KW - prior and posterior probability density functions

KW - prediction errors

KW - prediction limits

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1099-095X(200005/06)11:3<351::AID-ENV424>3.0.CO;2-Z

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1099-095X(200005/06)11:3<351::AID-ENV424>3.0.CO;2-Z

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

SP - 351

EP - 371

JO - Environmetrics

JF - Environmetrics

SN - 1099-095X

IS - 3

ER -