Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Beam selection in radiotherapy design
View graph of relations

Beam selection in radiotherapy design

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Beam selection in radiotherapy design. / Ehrgott, Matthias; Holder, Allen; Reese, Josh.
In: Linear Algebra and its Applications, Vol. 428, No. 5-6, 01.03.2008, p. 1272-1312.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Ehrgott, M, Holder, A & Reese, J 2008, 'Beam selection in radiotherapy design', Linear Algebra and its Applications, vol. 428, no. 5-6, pp. 1272-1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2007.05.039

APA

Ehrgott, M., Holder, A., & Reese, J. (2008). Beam selection in radiotherapy design. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 428(5-6), 1272-1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2007.05.039

Vancouver

Ehrgott M, Holder A, Reese J. Beam selection in radiotherapy design. Linear Algebra and its Applications. 2008 Mar 1;428(5-6):1272-1312. doi: 10.1016/j.laa.2007.05.039

Author

Ehrgott, Matthias ; Holder, Allen ; Reese, Josh. / Beam selection in radiotherapy design. In: Linear Algebra and its Applications. 2008 ; Vol. 428, No. 5-6. pp. 1272-1312.

Bibtex

@article{382ddc18d7a448b5b3c94007ab0191a9,
title = "Beam selection in radiotherapy design",
abstract = "The optimal design of a radiotherapy treatment depends on the collection of directions from which radiation is focused on the patient. These directions are manually selected and are based on the treatment planner{\textquoteright}s experience. Once the angles are chosen, there are numerous optimization models that decide a fluency pattern (exposure times) that best treats a patient. So, while optimization techniques are often used to decide how long a patient will be exposed to a high-energy particle beam, the directions themselves are not optimized. The problem with optimally selecting directions is that the underlying mixed integer models are well beyond our current solution capability. We present a rigorous mathematical development of the beam selection problem that provides a unified framework for the problem of selecting beam directions. This presentation provides insights into the techniques suggested in the literature and highlights the difficulty of the problem. We also compare several techniques head-to-head on two-dimensional problems.",
keywords = "Optimization, Set covering, Vector quantization, Radiotherapy, Radiosurgery, Medical Physics",
author = "Matthias Ehrgott and Allen Holder and Josh Reese",
year = "2008",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.laa.2007.05.039",
language = "English",
volume = "428",
pages = "1272--1312",
journal = "Linear Algebra and its Applications",
issn = "0024-3795",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5-6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Beam selection in radiotherapy design

AU - Ehrgott, Matthias

AU - Holder, Allen

AU - Reese, Josh

PY - 2008/3/1

Y1 - 2008/3/1

N2 - The optimal design of a radiotherapy treatment depends on the collection of directions from which radiation is focused on the patient. These directions are manually selected and are based on the treatment planner’s experience. Once the angles are chosen, there are numerous optimization models that decide a fluency pattern (exposure times) that best treats a patient. So, while optimization techniques are often used to decide how long a patient will be exposed to a high-energy particle beam, the directions themselves are not optimized. The problem with optimally selecting directions is that the underlying mixed integer models are well beyond our current solution capability. We present a rigorous mathematical development of the beam selection problem that provides a unified framework for the problem of selecting beam directions. This presentation provides insights into the techniques suggested in the literature and highlights the difficulty of the problem. We also compare several techniques head-to-head on two-dimensional problems.

AB - The optimal design of a radiotherapy treatment depends on the collection of directions from which radiation is focused on the patient. These directions are manually selected and are based on the treatment planner’s experience. Once the angles are chosen, there are numerous optimization models that decide a fluency pattern (exposure times) that best treats a patient. So, while optimization techniques are often used to decide how long a patient will be exposed to a high-energy particle beam, the directions themselves are not optimized. The problem with optimally selecting directions is that the underlying mixed integer models are well beyond our current solution capability. We present a rigorous mathematical development of the beam selection problem that provides a unified framework for the problem of selecting beam directions. This presentation provides insights into the techniques suggested in the literature and highlights the difficulty of the problem. We also compare several techniques head-to-head on two-dimensional problems.

KW - Optimization

KW - Set covering

KW - Vector quantization

KW - Radiotherapy

KW - Radiosurgery

KW - Medical Physics

U2 - 10.1016/j.laa.2007.05.039

DO - 10.1016/j.laa.2007.05.039

M3 - Journal article

VL - 428

SP - 1272

EP - 1312

JO - Linear Algebra and its Applications

JF - Linear Algebra and its Applications

SN - 0024-3795

IS - 5-6

ER -