Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Between Truth and Hope

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Between Truth and Hope: On Parkinson's Disease, Neurotransplantation and the Production of the 'Self'.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Between Truth and Hope: On Parkinson's Disease, Neurotransplantation and the Production of the 'Self'. / Moreira, Tiago; Palladino, Paolo.
In: History of the Human Sciences, Vol. 18, No. 3, 08.2005, p. 55-82.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Moreira T, Palladino P. Between Truth and Hope: On Parkinson's Disease, Neurotransplantation and the Production of the 'Self'. History of the Human Sciences. 2005 Aug;18(3):55-82. doi: 10.1177/0952695105059306

Author

Moreira, Tiago ; Palladino, Paolo. / Between Truth and Hope : On Parkinson's Disease, Neurotransplantation and the Production of the 'Self'. In: History of the Human Sciences. 2005 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 55-82.

Bibtex

@article{7675bae7f2a14450896a986b90ca09d2,
title = "Between Truth and Hope: On Parkinson's Disease, Neurotransplantation and the Production of the 'Self'.",
abstract = "In this article, we argue that contemporary biomedicine is shaped by two, seemingly incommensurable, organizational logics, the {\textquoteleft}regime of truth{\textquoteright} and the {\textquoteleft}regime of hope{\textquoteright}. We articulate their features by drawing on debates sparked by the recent clinical trial of a new approach to the treatment of Parkinson{\textquoteright}s Disease. We also argue that the {\textquoteleft}self{\textquoteright} is configured in the very same process whereby these two organizational logics interlock and become mutually dependent, so that the {\textquoteleft}self{\textquoteright} might be said to be the effect of a {\textquoteleft}parasitic{\textquoteright} relationship between the regimes of {\textquoteleft}truth{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}hope{\textquoteright}. We then bring these two arguments to bear on the contrasting views of the relationship between embodiment and political subjectivity articulated by Michel Foucault and Giorgio Agamben, on the one hand, and Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose, on the other hand.",
keywords = "biopolitics • neurosciences • self • stem cells • subjectivity",
author = "Tiago Moreira and Paolo Palladino",
note = "“The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, History of the Human Sciences, 18 (3), 2005, {\textcopyright} SAGE Publications Ltd, 2005 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the History of the Human Sciences page: http://hhs.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/",
year = "2005",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1177/0952695105059306",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "55--82",
journal = "History of the Human Sciences",
issn = "1461-720X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between Truth and Hope

T2 - On Parkinson's Disease, Neurotransplantation and the Production of the 'Self'.

AU - Moreira, Tiago

AU - Palladino, Paolo

N1 - “The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, History of the Human Sciences, 18 (3), 2005, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2005 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the History of the Human Sciences page: http://hhs.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/

PY - 2005/8

Y1 - 2005/8

N2 - In this article, we argue that contemporary biomedicine is shaped by two, seemingly incommensurable, organizational logics, the ‘regime of truth’ and the ‘regime of hope’. We articulate their features by drawing on debates sparked by the recent clinical trial of a new approach to the treatment of Parkinson’s Disease. We also argue that the ‘self’ is configured in the very same process whereby these two organizational logics interlock and become mutually dependent, so that the ‘self’ might be said to be the effect of a ‘parasitic’ relationship between the regimes of ‘truth’ and ‘hope’. We then bring these two arguments to bear on the contrasting views of the relationship between embodiment and political subjectivity articulated by Michel Foucault and Giorgio Agamben, on the one hand, and Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose, on the other hand.

AB - In this article, we argue that contemporary biomedicine is shaped by two, seemingly incommensurable, organizational logics, the ‘regime of truth’ and the ‘regime of hope’. We articulate their features by drawing on debates sparked by the recent clinical trial of a new approach to the treatment of Parkinson’s Disease. We also argue that the ‘self’ is configured in the very same process whereby these two organizational logics interlock and become mutually dependent, so that the ‘self’ might be said to be the effect of a ‘parasitic’ relationship between the regimes of ‘truth’ and ‘hope’. We then bring these two arguments to bear on the contrasting views of the relationship between embodiment and political subjectivity articulated by Michel Foucault and Giorgio Agamben, on the one hand, and Paul Rabinow and Nikolas Rose, on the other hand.

KW - biopolitics • neurosciences • self • stem cells • subjectivity

U2 - 10.1177/0952695105059306

DO - 10.1177/0952695105059306

M3 - Journal article

VL - 18

SP - 55

EP - 82

JO - History of the Human Sciences

JF - History of the Human Sciences

SN - 1461-720X

IS - 3

ER -