Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Beyond Control: Towards an Ecology of Uncertainty.

Electronic data

  • 11003767.pdf

    Final published version, 8.2 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-ND

Keywords

View graph of relations

Beyond Control: Towards an Ecology of Uncertainty.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Unpublished

Standard

Beyond Control: Towards an Ecology of Uncertainty. / Wilson, Mark.
Lancaster: Lancaster University, 2012. 166 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Harvard

Wilson, M 2012, 'Beyond Control: Towards an Ecology of Uncertainty.', PhD, Lancaster University, Lancaster.

APA

Wilson, M. (2012). Beyond Control: Towards an Ecology of Uncertainty. [Doctoral Thesis, Lancaster University]. Lancaster University.

Vancouver

Wilson M. Beyond Control: Towards an Ecology of Uncertainty.. Lancaster: Lancaster University, 2012. 166 p.

Author

Wilson, Mark. / Beyond Control: Towards an Ecology of Uncertainty.. Lancaster : Lancaster University, 2012. 166 p.

Bibtex

@phdthesis{db3dfaf4e039445fb1249043f09f8b0f,
title = "Beyond Control: Towards an Ecology of Uncertainty.",
abstract = "With specific reference to five discrete projects, this supporting text sets out to explain the methodologies, dynamics and rationale behind the installation-based and collaborative art practice of Snaebjornsdottir/Wilson, in relation to contemporary art methodologies and the chronologically parallel and equally emergent academic fields of Artistic Research and Animal Studies. The projects are represented by four monographs and one book chapter, each of which has its basis in a substantial art project involving a sustained period of interdisciplinary research and practice and involving one or multiple exhibitions. A series of research questions pertinent to the cross-disciplinary nature of my practice has been tested in respect of each project within the context of an overarching set of meta-questions pertinent to the practice as a whole. As my practice seeks to challenge assumptions, regarding for instance knowledge systems and representation it is the function of this text to present the projects in relation to knowledge production more widely, its currency, value and the basis upon which its value is estimated. I demonstrate how the dynamic of collaboration is integral to the principles of relationality embedded in the work and how those principles reverberate through our methodology and through the participation of the professionals, amateurs, and academics who contribute variously to the projects. Although working counter to subject-specificity as a matter of strategy, I discuss how certain subject-specific models (for example anthropological interview techniques and surveys, museum display, hunting etc.) are nonetheless appropriated and deployed in order to ground and inform critique. The latter and significant proportion of the text is devoted to providing a conceptually and materially descriptive summary of each project, clarifying project-specific research questions and propositions and detailing the relationship of each publication here included, to the research field(s) and the associated artworks.",
keywords = "MiAaPQ, Ecology.",
author = "Mark Wilson",
note = "Thesis (Ph.D.)--Lancaster University (United Kingdom), 2012.",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
publisher = "Lancaster University",
school = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Beyond Control: Towards an Ecology of Uncertainty.

AU - Wilson, Mark

N1 - Thesis (Ph.D.)--Lancaster University (United Kingdom), 2012.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - With specific reference to five discrete projects, this supporting text sets out to explain the methodologies, dynamics and rationale behind the installation-based and collaborative art practice of Snaebjornsdottir/Wilson, in relation to contemporary art methodologies and the chronologically parallel and equally emergent academic fields of Artistic Research and Animal Studies. The projects are represented by four monographs and one book chapter, each of which has its basis in a substantial art project involving a sustained period of interdisciplinary research and practice and involving one or multiple exhibitions. A series of research questions pertinent to the cross-disciplinary nature of my practice has been tested in respect of each project within the context of an overarching set of meta-questions pertinent to the practice as a whole. As my practice seeks to challenge assumptions, regarding for instance knowledge systems and representation it is the function of this text to present the projects in relation to knowledge production more widely, its currency, value and the basis upon which its value is estimated. I demonstrate how the dynamic of collaboration is integral to the principles of relationality embedded in the work and how those principles reverberate through our methodology and through the participation of the professionals, amateurs, and academics who contribute variously to the projects. Although working counter to subject-specificity as a matter of strategy, I discuss how certain subject-specific models (for example anthropological interview techniques and surveys, museum display, hunting etc.) are nonetheless appropriated and deployed in order to ground and inform critique. The latter and significant proportion of the text is devoted to providing a conceptually and materially descriptive summary of each project, clarifying project-specific research questions and propositions and detailing the relationship of each publication here included, to the research field(s) and the associated artworks.

AB - With specific reference to five discrete projects, this supporting text sets out to explain the methodologies, dynamics and rationale behind the installation-based and collaborative art practice of Snaebjornsdottir/Wilson, in relation to contemporary art methodologies and the chronologically parallel and equally emergent academic fields of Artistic Research and Animal Studies. The projects are represented by four monographs and one book chapter, each of which has its basis in a substantial art project involving a sustained period of interdisciplinary research and practice and involving one or multiple exhibitions. A series of research questions pertinent to the cross-disciplinary nature of my practice has been tested in respect of each project within the context of an overarching set of meta-questions pertinent to the practice as a whole. As my practice seeks to challenge assumptions, regarding for instance knowledge systems and representation it is the function of this text to present the projects in relation to knowledge production more widely, its currency, value and the basis upon which its value is estimated. I demonstrate how the dynamic of collaboration is integral to the principles of relationality embedded in the work and how those principles reverberate through our methodology and through the participation of the professionals, amateurs, and academics who contribute variously to the projects. Although working counter to subject-specificity as a matter of strategy, I discuss how certain subject-specific models (for example anthropological interview techniques and surveys, museum display, hunting etc.) are nonetheless appropriated and deployed in order to ground and inform critique. The latter and significant proportion of the text is devoted to providing a conceptually and materially descriptive summary of each project, clarifying project-specific research questions and propositions and detailing the relationship of each publication here included, to the research field(s) and the associated artworks.

KW - MiAaPQ

KW - Ecology.

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

PB - Lancaster University

CY - Lancaster

ER -