Accepted author manuscript, 385 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond GMV
T2 - the relevance of covariance matrix estimation for risk-based portfolio construction
AU - Dom, M.S.
AU - Howard, C.
AU - Jansen, M.
AU - Lohre, H.
PY - 2025/3/31
Y1 - 2025/3/31
N2 - We empirically analyze the relevance of variance-covariance (VCV) estimators in equity portfolio construction. While traditional analyses of unconstrained global minimum-variance (GMV) portfolios support using shrinkage and modeling covariance dynamics, the resulting portfolios are often impractical due to high leverage, concentration, and costs. By examining constrained GMV and risk parity portfolios, we find a significantly reduced opportunity for alternative VCV estimators to outperform the sample estimator. Specifically, we show that a long-only portfolio with asset-level constraints and a transaction cost penalty produces similar results to shrinkage-based methods, even when using the sample VCV estimator. However, accounting for time-series dynamics in asset returns remains statistically relevant for volatility reduction. Our findings emphasize how the interaction between VCV estimators and portfolio construction choices shapes both the statistical and practical outcomes in portfolio management.
AB - We empirically analyze the relevance of variance-covariance (VCV) estimators in equity portfolio construction. While traditional analyses of unconstrained global minimum-variance (GMV) portfolios support using shrinkage and modeling covariance dynamics, the resulting portfolios are often impractical due to high leverage, concentration, and costs. By examining constrained GMV and risk parity portfolios, we find a significantly reduced opportunity for alternative VCV estimators to outperform the sample estimator. Specifically, we show that a long-only portfolio with asset-level constraints and a transaction cost penalty produces similar results to shrinkage-based methods, even when using the sample VCV estimator. However, accounting for time-series dynamics in asset returns remains statistically relevant for volatility reduction. Our findings emphasize how the interaction between VCV estimators and portfolio construction choices shapes both the statistical and practical outcomes in portfolio management.
U2 - 10.1080/14697688.2025.2468268
DO - 10.1080/14697688.2025.2468268
M3 - Journal article
VL - 25
SP - 403
EP - 419
JO - Quantitative Finance
JF - Quantitative Finance
SN - 1469-7688
IS - 3
ER -