Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Biodiversity and ecosystem function of tropical...
View graph of relations

Biodiversity and ecosystem function of tropical forest dung beetles under contrasting logging regimes

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Biodiversity and ecosystem function of tropical forest dung beetles under contrasting logging regimes. / Slade, Eleanor M.; Mann, Darren J.; Lewis, Owen T.
In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 144, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 166-174.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Slade EM, Mann DJ, Lewis OT. Biodiversity and ecosystem function of tropical forest dung beetles under contrasting logging regimes. Biological Conservation. 2011 Jan;144(1):166-174. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.011

Author

Slade, Eleanor M. ; Mann, Darren J. ; Lewis, Owen T. / Biodiversity and ecosystem function of tropical forest dung beetles under contrasting logging regimes. In: Biological Conservation. 2011 ; Vol. 144, No. 1. pp. 166-174.

Bibtex

@article{8e6e4e656f1e445ea8a48b913c61519c,
title = "Biodiversity and ecosystem function of tropical forest dung beetles under contrasting logging regimes",
abstract = "A key challenge for tropical conservation biologists is to assess how forest management practices affect biodiversity and associated ecosystem functions. Dung beetles (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) provide an ideal focal guild for such studies. We compared dung beetle assemblages and experimentally assessed rates of dung removal and seed burial in undisturbed forest, low-intensity selectively logged forest under sustainable forest management, and high-intensity logged forest, not under sustainable management in Malaysian Borneo. In total, 7923 individuals from 39 species of dung beetle were collected. There were no significant differences in abundance, biomass or diversity across sites. Species richness was significantly lower in the high-intensity logged sites. Beta diversity was low: of 35 species recorded in undisturbed forest sites, 32 were also captured in low-intensity sites and 29 in high-intensity sites. The environmental and vegetation variables measured had little influence on species composition. An average of 63–99% of dung was removed over 24 h. Mean dung and seed removal were significantly lower in the high-intensity logged sites. Dung removal rates were significantly and positively correlated with dung beetle species richness, but not with dung beetle biomass or abundance. However, the biomass of large-bodied, nocturnal dung beetles was positively correlated with dung removal. In contrast to previous studies, dung beetle biomass and abundance were not correlated with species richness, indicative of density compensation. Overall, dung beetle communities and associated ecosystem functions were robust to low-intensity but not high-intensity selective logging. These differences may be related to changes in the abundance and biomass of particular dung beetle species or guilds rather than community-wide measures of abundance and biomass, highlighting the need to move beyond simplistic biodiversity-ecosystem functioning correlations to understand the functional consequences of habitat modification in high-diversity ecosystems.",
keywords = "Scarabaeinae, Dung removal, Seed dispersal, Forest management, Biodiversity Ecosystem Functioning",
author = "Slade, {Eleanor M.} and Mann, {Darren J.} and Lewis, {Owen T.}",
year = "2011",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.011",
language = "English",
volume = "144",
pages = "166--174",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biodiversity and ecosystem function of tropical forest dung beetles under contrasting logging regimes

AU - Slade, Eleanor M.

AU - Mann, Darren J.

AU - Lewis, Owen T.

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - A key challenge for tropical conservation biologists is to assess how forest management practices affect biodiversity and associated ecosystem functions. Dung beetles (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) provide an ideal focal guild for such studies. We compared dung beetle assemblages and experimentally assessed rates of dung removal and seed burial in undisturbed forest, low-intensity selectively logged forest under sustainable forest management, and high-intensity logged forest, not under sustainable management in Malaysian Borneo. In total, 7923 individuals from 39 species of dung beetle were collected. There were no significant differences in abundance, biomass or diversity across sites. Species richness was significantly lower in the high-intensity logged sites. Beta diversity was low: of 35 species recorded in undisturbed forest sites, 32 were also captured in low-intensity sites and 29 in high-intensity sites. The environmental and vegetation variables measured had little influence on species composition. An average of 63–99% of dung was removed over 24 h. Mean dung and seed removal were significantly lower in the high-intensity logged sites. Dung removal rates were significantly and positively correlated with dung beetle species richness, but not with dung beetle biomass or abundance. However, the biomass of large-bodied, nocturnal dung beetles was positively correlated with dung removal. In contrast to previous studies, dung beetle biomass and abundance were not correlated with species richness, indicative of density compensation. Overall, dung beetle communities and associated ecosystem functions were robust to low-intensity but not high-intensity selective logging. These differences may be related to changes in the abundance and biomass of particular dung beetle species or guilds rather than community-wide measures of abundance and biomass, highlighting the need to move beyond simplistic biodiversity-ecosystem functioning correlations to understand the functional consequences of habitat modification in high-diversity ecosystems.

AB - A key challenge for tropical conservation biologists is to assess how forest management practices affect biodiversity and associated ecosystem functions. Dung beetles (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) provide an ideal focal guild for such studies. We compared dung beetle assemblages and experimentally assessed rates of dung removal and seed burial in undisturbed forest, low-intensity selectively logged forest under sustainable forest management, and high-intensity logged forest, not under sustainable management in Malaysian Borneo. In total, 7923 individuals from 39 species of dung beetle were collected. There were no significant differences in abundance, biomass or diversity across sites. Species richness was significantly lower in the high-intensity logged sites. Beta diversity was low: of 35 species recorded in undisturbed forest sites, 32 were also captured in low-intensity sites and 29 in high-intensity sites. The environmental and vegetation variables measured had little influence on species composition. An average of 63–99% of dung was removed over 24 h. Mean dung and seed removal were significantly lower in the high-intensity logged sites. Dung removal rates were significantly and positively correlated with dung beetle species richness, but not with dung beetle biomass or abundance. However, the biomass of large-bodied, nocturnal dung beetles was positively correlated with dung removal. In contrast to previous studies, dung beetle biomass and abundance were not correlated with species richness, indicative of density compensation. Overall, dung beetle communities and associated ecosystem functions were robust to low-intensity but not high-intensity selective logging. These differences may be related to changes in the abundance and biomass of particular dung beetle species or guilds rather than community-wide measures of abundance and biomass, highlighting the need to move beyond simplistic biodiversity-ecosystem functioning correlations to understand the functional consequences of habitat modification in high-diversity ecosystems.

KW - Scarabaeinae

KW - Dung removal

KW - Seed dispersal

KW - Forest management

KW - Biodiversity Ecosystem Functioning

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.011

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.011

M3 - Journal article

VL - 144

SP - 166

EP - 174

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

IS - 1

ER -