Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Biological tools for the assessment of contamin...
View graph of relations

Biological tools for the assessment of contaminated land: applied soil ecotoxicology.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Biological tools for the assessment of contaminated land: applied soil ecotoxicology. / Paton, G. I.; Killham, K.; Weitz, H. J. et al.
In: Soil Use and Management, Vol. 21, No. Suppl., 12.2005, p. 487-499.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Paton, GI, Killham, K, Weitz, HJ & Semple, KT 2005, 'Biological tools for the assessment of contaminated land: applied soil ecotoxicology.', Soil Use and Management, vol. 21, no. Suppl., pp. 487-499. https://doi.org/10.1079/SUM2005350

APA

Paton, G. I., Killham, K., Weitz, H. J., & Semple, K. T. (2005). Biological tools for the assessment of contaminated land: applied soil ecotoxicology. Soil Use and Management, 21(Suppl.), 487-499. https://doi.org/10.1079/SUM2005350

Vancouver

Paton GI, Killham K, Weitz HJ, Semple KT. Biological tools for the assessment of contaminated land: applied soil ecotoxicology. Soil Use and Management. 2005 Dec;21(Suppl.):487-499. doi: 10.1079/SUM2005350

Author

Paton, G. I. ; Killham, K. ; Weitz, H. J. et al. / Biological tools for the assessment of contaminated land: applied soil ecotoxicology. In: Soil Use and Management. 2005 ; Vol. 21, No. Suppl. pp. 487-499.

Bibtex

@article{5f549b5b8870455dbd64c2abb5051aba,
title = "Biological tools for the assessment of contaminated land: applied soil ecotoxicology.",
abstract = "Chemical analysis alone is inadequate for comprehensively assessing the impact of soil pollution on biota. The term bioavailability can only be applied in a context specific to a target biological receptor or a proven chemical surrogate. Integration of biological and chemical data can often yield significant advances in hazard assessment and act as a suitable baseline for making site-specific risk assessments. Here, the value of biological techniques is discussed and their application described. The relative merit of test selection is considered and the new direction being developed in sublethal assessments. Currently, however, one of the major limitations is the seeming lack of flexibility of many assays in that they are either applicable to agricultural systems or industrial scenarios, but rarely to both. As a consequence, few assays have internationally adopted protocols. The introduction of new methods and the continued improvement and refinement of assays make this area of soil science dynamic and responsive.",
keywords = "contaminated land, bioassays, soil ecotoxicology, bioavailability, hazard assessment",
author = "Paton, {G. I.} and K. Killham and Weitz, {H. J.} and Semple, {Kirk T.}",
year = "2005",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1079/SUM2005350",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "487--499",
journal = "Soil Use and Management",
issn = "0266-0032",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "Suppl.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biological tools for the assessment of contaminated land: applied soil ecotoxicology.

AU - Paton, G. I.

AU - Killham, K.

AU - Weitz, H. J.

AU - Semple, Kirk T.

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Chemical analysis alone is inadequate for comprehensively assessing the impact of soil pollution on biota. The term bioavailability can only be applied in a context specific to a target biological receptor or a proven chemical surrogate. Integration of biological and chemical data can often yield significant advances in hazard assessment and act as a suitable baseline for making site-specific risk assessments. Here, the value of biological techniques is discussed and their application described. The relative merit of test selection is considered and the new direction being developed in sublethal assessments. Currently, however, one of the major limitations is the seeming lack of flexibility of many assays in that they are either applicable to agricultural systems or industrial scenarios, but rarely to both. As a consequence, few assays have internationally adopted protocols. The introduction of new methods and the continued improvement and refinement of assays make this area of soil science dynamic and responsive.

AB - Chemical analysis alone is inadequate for comprehensively assessing the impact of soil pollution on biota. The term bioavailability can only be applied in a context specific to a target biological receptor or a proven chemical surrogate. Integration of biological and chemical data can often yield significant advances in hazard assessment and act as a suitable baseline for making site-specific risk assessments. Here, the value of biological techniques is discussed and their application described. The relative merit of test selection is considered and the new direction being developed in sublethal assessments. Currently, however, one of the major limitations is the seeming lack of flexibility of many assays in that they are either applicable to agricultural systems or industrial scenarios, but rarely to both. As a consequence, few assays have internationally adopted protocols. The introduction of new methods and the continued improvement and refinement of assays make this area of soil science dynamic and responsive.

KW - contaminated land

KW - bioassays

KW - soil ecotoxicology

KW - bioavailability

KW - hazard assessment

U2 - 10.1079/SUM2005350

DO - 10.1079/SUM2005350

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 487

EP - 499

JO - Soil Use and Management

JF - Soil Use and Management

SN - 0266-0032

IS - Suppl.

ER -