Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Biometric Mirror

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Biometric Mirror: Exploring Ethical Opinions towards Facial Analysis and Automated Decision-Making

Research output: Other contribution

Published

Standard

Biometric Mirror: Exploring Ethical Opinions towards Facial Analysis and Automated Decision-Making. / Wouters, Niels; Kelly, Ryan; Velloso, Eduardo et al.
15 p. 2019. (DIS 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference).

Research output: Other contribution

Harvard

APA

Wouters, N., Kelly, R., Velloso, E., Wolf, K., Ferdous, H. S., Newn, J., Joukhadar, Z., & Vetere, F. (2019, Jun 18). Biometric Mirror: Exploring Ethical Opinions towards Facial Analysis and Automated Decision-Making. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322304

Vancouver

Wouters N, Kelly R, Velloso E, Wolf K, Ferdous HS, Newn J et al. Biometric Mirror: Exploring Ethical Opinions towards Facial Analysis and Automated Decision-Making. 2019. 15 p. doi: 10.1145/3322276.3322304

Author

Wouters, Niels ; Kelly, Ryan ; Velloso, Eduardo et al. / Biometric Mirror : Exploring Ethical Opinions towards Facial Analysis and Automated Decision-Making. 2019. 15 p. (DIS 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference).

Bibtex

@misc{fc6c55b281b744e09478781915c027fc,
title = "Biometric Mirror: Exploring Ethical Opinions towards Facial Analysis and Automated Decision-Making",
abstract = "Facial analysis applications are increasingly being applied to inform decision-making processes. However, as global reports of unfairness emerge, governments, academia and industry have recognized the ethical limitations and societal implications of this technology. Alongside initiatives that aim to formulate ethical frameworks, we believe that the public should be invited to participate in the debate. In this paper, we discuss Biometric Mirror, a case study that explored opinions about the ethics of an emerging technology. The interactive application distinguished demographic and psychometric information from people's facial photos and presented speculative scenarios with potential consequences based on their results. We analyzed the interactions with Biometric Mirror and media reports covering the study. Our findings demonstrate the nature of public opinion about the technology's possibilities, reliability, and privacy implications. Our study indicates an opportunity for case study-based digital ethics research, and we provide practical guidelines for designing future studies.",
author = "Niels Wouters and Ryan Kelly and Eduardo Velloso and Katrin Wolf and Ferdous, {Hasan Shahid} and Joshua Newn and Zaher Joukhadar and Frank Vetere",
year = "2019",
month = jun,
day = "18",
doi = "10.1145/3322276.3322304",
language = "English",
series = "DIS 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference",
type = "Other",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Biometric Mirror

T2 - Exploring Ethical Opinions towards Facial Analysis and Automated Decision-Making

AU - Wouters, Niels

AU - Kelly, Ryan

AU - Velloso, Eduardo

AU - Wolf, Katrin

AU - Ferdous, Hasan Shahid

AU - Newn, Joshua

AU - Joukhadar, Zaher

AU - Vetere, Frank

PY - 2019/6/18

Y1 - 2019/6/18

N2 - Facial analysis applications are increasingly being applied to inform decision-making processes. However, as global reports of unfairness emerge, governments, academia and industry have recognized the ethical limitations and societal implications of this technology. Alongside initiatives that aim to formulate ethical frameworks, we believe that the public should be invited to participate in the debate. In this paper, we discuss Biometric Mirror, a case study that explored opinions about the ethics of an emerging technology. The interactive application distinguished demographic and psychometric information from people's facial photos and presented speculative scenarios with potential consequences based on their results. We analyzed the interactions with Biometric Mirror and media reports covering the study. Our findings demonstrate the nature of public opinion about the technology's possibilities, reliability, and privacy implications. Our study indicates an opportunity for case study-based digital ethics research, and we provide practical guidelines for designing future studies.

AB - Facial analysis applications are increasingly being applied to inform decision-making processes. However, as global reports of unfairness emerge, governments, academia and industry have recognized the ethical limitations and societal implications of this technology. Alongside initiatives that aim to formulate ethical frameworks, we believe that the public should be invited to participate in the debate. In this paper, we discuss Biometric Mirror, a case study that explored opinions about the ethics of an emerging technology. The interactive application distinguished demographic and psychometric information from people's facial photos and presented speculative scenarios with potential consequences based on their results. We analyzed the interactions with Biometric Mirror and media reports covering the study. Our findings demonstrate the nature of public opinion about the technology's possibilities, reliability, and privacy implications. Our study indicates an opportunity for case study-based digital ethics research, and we provide practical guidelines for designing future studies.

U2 - 10.1145/3322276.3322304

DO - 10.1145/3322276.3322304

M3 - Other contribution

T3 - DIS 2019 - Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

ER -