Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Bound person forms in ditransitive clauses revi...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Bound person forms in ditransitive clauses revisited.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Bound person forms in ditransitive clauses revisited. / Siewierska, Anna; Bakker, Dik.
In: Functions of Language, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2007, p. 103-125.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Siewierska, A & Bakker, D 2007, 'Bound person forms in ditransitive clauses revisited.', Functions of Language, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 103-125. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.14.1.07sie

APA

Vancouver

Siewierska A, Bakker D. Bound person forms in ditransitive clauses revisited. Functions of Language. 2007;14(1):103-125. doi: 10.1075/fol.14.1.07sie

Author

Siewierska, Anna ; Bakker, Dik. / Bound person forms in ditransitive clauses revisited. In: Functions of Language. 2007 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 103-125.

Bibtex

@article{d3149060f7bc4a75a7702a1220edd292,
title = "Bound person forms in ditransitive clauses revisited.",
abstract = "In a recent article Gensler (2003) has argued that little can be said about the ordering of bound person markers of the T(heme) and R(ecipient) relative to each other or relative to the verb stem apart from the fact that the outer markers are likely to be the result of a second-level cliticization process. We take issue with this claim and document that quite successful predictions with respect to the ordering of the T and R markers can be made on the basis of morphological alignment. Taking as our point of departure the typology of ditransitive alignment outlined in Haspelmath (2004; 2005), we show that the ordering patterns in which the R is placed closer to the verbal stem than the T are favoured in all relevant alignment types apart from the indirective, which exhibits a preference for positioning the T closer to the verbal stem than the R. These preferences for the ordering of the R and T are argued to relate directly to the frequency of use of the relative person forms and thus are seen as constituting yet another piece of evidence for the usage-based model of grammar being developed within the functional-cognitive typological paradigm (cf. e.g. Barlow & Kemmer 2000; Bybee & Hopper 2001; Tomasello 2003).",
author = "Anna Siewierska and Dik Bakker",
note = "Contact publisher for further reprinting or re-use. {\textcopyright} Copyright 2007 John Benjamins.",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1075/fol.14.1.07sie",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "103--125",
journal = "Functions of Language",
issn = "1569-9765",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bound person forms in ditransitive clauses revisited.

AU - Siewierska, Anna

AU - Bakker, Dik

N1 - Contact publisher for further reprinting or re-use. © Copyright 2007 John Benjamins.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - In a recent article Gensler (2003) has argued that little can be said about the ordering of bound person markers of the T(heme) and R(ecipient) relative to each other or relative to the verb stem apart from the fact that the outer markers are likely to be the result of a second-level cliticization process. We take issue with this claim and document that quite successful predictions with respect to the ordering of the T and R markers can be made on the basis of morphological alignment. Taking as our point of departure the typology of ditransitive alignment outlined in Haspelmath (2004; 2005), we show that the ordering patterns in which the R is placed closer to the verbal stem than the T are favoured in all relevant alignment types apart from the indirective, which exhibits a preference for positioning the T closer to the verbal stem than the R. These preferences for the ordering of the R and T are argued to relate directly to the frequency of use of the relative person forms and thus are seen as constituting yet another piece of evidence for the usage-based model of grammar being developed within the functional-cognitive typological paradigm (cf. e.g. Barlow & Kemmer 2000; Bybee & Hopper 2001; Tomasello 2003).

AB - In a recent article Gensler (2003) has argued that little can be said about the ordering of bound person markers of the T(heme) and R(ecipient) relative to each other or relative to the verb stem apart from the fact that the outer markers are likely to be the result of a second-level cliticization process. We take issue with this claim and document that quite successful predictions with respect to the ordering of the T and R markers can be made on the basis of morphological alignment. Taking as our point of departure the typology of ditransitive alignment outlined in Haspelmath (2004; 2005), we show that the ordering patterns in which the R is placed closer to the verbal stem than the T are favoured in all relevant alignment types apart from the indirective, which exhibits a preference for positioning the T closer to the verbal stem than the R. These preferences for the ordering of the R and T are argued to relate directly to the frequency of use of the relative person forms and thus are seen as constituting yet another piece of evidence for the usage-based model of grammar being developed within the functional-cognitive typological paradigm (cf. e.g. Barlow & Kemmer 2000; Bybee & Hopper 2001; Tomasello 2003).

U2 - 10.1075/fol.14.1.07sie

DO - 10.1075/fol.14.1.07sie

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

SP - 103

EP - 125

JO - Functions of Language

JF - Functions of Language

SN - 1569-9765

IS - 1

ER -