Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Breaking barriers in clinical communication: ar...
View graph of relations

Breaking barriers in clinical communication: are securely attached doctors more empathetic doctors?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Breaking barriers in clinical communication: are securely attached doctors more empathetic doctors? / Atherton, K; Chisholm, A; Rutter, L et al.
In: Reinvention, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2009, p. 2-6.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Atherton, K ; Chisholm, A ; Rutter, L et al. / Breaking barriers in clinical communication: are securely attached doctors more empathetic doctors?. In: Reinvention. 2009 ; Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 2-6.

Bibtex

@article{654e240b3e274d6db51cfbd1bd6356f7,
title = "Breaking barriers in clinical communication: are securely attached doctors more empathetic doctors?",
abstract = "Patients often present hints to emotional issues in clinical interactions. However, these are often missed by healthcare providers. It is unknown why some healthcare providers attend to more patient cues/concerns than others. Bowlby{\textquoteright}s Attachment theory (1973) relates experiences in infancy to adult relationship models and some evidence suggests that attachment relationship models can predict health provider willingness to engage with emotional aspects of patients{\textquoteright} consultations. However it is not known if this association can be demonstrated during medical training, i.e. at a time when educational intervention is feasible. The aim of this study was to examine whether securely attached student doctors respond to patient cues/concerns in a more empathic manner compared to insecurely attached student doctors. Videotaped interactions between student doctors and simulated patients were coded for responses to patient-initiated cues and concerns. These were compared between securely and insecurely attached students. Contrary to our hypothesis there were no significant differences between securely and insecurely attached student doctors. Theoretical and methodological issues are discussed in order to address how to develop this important area of healthcare research.",
keywords = "attachment, clinical communication, empathy, healthcare provider, patient",
author = "K Atherton and A Chisholm and L Rutter and S Peters and Ian Fletcher",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "2--6",
journal = "Reinvention",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Breaking barriers in clinical communication: are securely attached doctors more empathetic doctors?

AU - Atherton, K

AU - Chisholm, A

AU - Rutter, L

AU - Peters, S

AU - Fletcher, Ian

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Patients often present hints to emotional issues in clinical interactions. However, these are often missed by healthcare providers. It is unknown why some healthcare providers attend to more patient cues/concerns than others. Bowlby’s Attachment theory (1973) relates experiences in infancy to adult relationship models and some evidence suggests that attachment relationship models can predict health provider willingness to engage with emotional aspects of patients’ consultations. However it is not known if this association can be demonstrated during medical training, i.e. at a time when educational intervention is feasible. The aim of this study was to examine whether securely attached student doctors respond to patient cues/concerns in a more empathic manner compared to insecurely attached student doctors. Videotaped interactions between student doctors and simulated patients were coded for responses to patient-initiated cues and concerns. These were compared between securely and insecurely attached students. Contrary to our hypothesis there were no significant differences between securely and insecurely attached student doctors. Theoretical and methodological issues are discussed in order to address how to develop this important area of healthcare research.

AB - Patients often present hints to emotional issues in clinical interactions. However, these are often missed by healthcare providers. It is unknown why some healthcare providers attend to more patient cues/concerns than others. Bowlby’s Attachment theory (1973) relates experiences in infancy to adult relationship models and some evidence suggests that attachment relationship models can predict health provider willingness to engage with emotional aspects of patients’ consultations. However it is not known if this association can be demonstrated during medical training, i.e. at a time when educational intervention is feasible. The aim of this study was to examine whether securely attached student doctors respond to patient cues/concerns in a more empathic manner compared to insecurely attached student doctors. Videotaped interactions between student doctors and simulated patients were coded for responses to patient-initiated cues and concerns. These were compared between securely and insecurely attached students. Contrary to our hypothesis there were no significant differences between securely and insecurely attached student doctors. Theoretical and methodological issues are discussed in order to address how to develop this important area of healthcare research.

KW - attachment

KW - clinical communication

KW - empathy

KW - healthcare provider

KW - patient

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2

SP - 2

EP - 6

JO - Reinvention

JF - Reinvention

IS - 1

ER -