Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Bridge over the river crime

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Bridge over the river crime: mobility and the policing of organised crime

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Bridge over the river crime: mobility and the policing of organised crime. / Hedley-Penna, Susan; Kirby, Stuart.
In: Mobilities, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2013, p. 487-505.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Hedley-Penna, S & Kirby, S 2013, 'Bridge over the river crime: mobility and the policing of organised crime', Mobilities, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 487-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.705508

APA

Hedley-Penna, S., & Kirby, S. (2013). Bridge over the river crime: mobility and the policing of organised crime. Mobilities, 8(4), 487-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2012.705508

Vancouver

Hedley-Penna S, Kirby S. Bridge over the river crime: mobility and the policing of organised crime. Mobilities. 2013;8(4):487-505. Epub 2012 Jul 25. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2012.705508

Author

Hedley-Penna, Susan ; Kirby, Stuart. / Bridge over the river crime : mobility and the policing of organised crime. In: Mobilities. 2013 ; Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 487-505.

Bibtex

@article{99f2b08b8ff343e985cff0770bc7e0a5,
title = "Bridge over the river crime: mobility and the policing of organised crime",
abstract = "This paper examines the significant disparity between the mobility of organised crime and the mobility of law enforcement through the use of Kaufmann{\textquoteright}s (2002) three categories of motility: access, skills and appropriation. It argues that the differential mobility of organised crime and law enforcement can be accounted for by the differential insertion of these groups of actors into {\textquoteleft}the practice and politics of market liberalisation and the practice and politics of market criminalisation{\textquoteright}, and suggests that it is possible to view each of these as inhabiting {\textquoteleft}different modernities{\textquoteright}. It concludes that whilst mobility systems are critical to understanding the movement of these groups of actors, these systems are themselves embedded within different institutional structures that shape the opportunities to be mobile, in particular economic and political structures.",
keywords = "mobility , organised crime, Enterprise crime, Policing, Illicit flows",
author = "Susan Hedley-Penna and Stuart Kirby",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/17450101.2012.705508",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "487--505",
journal = "Mobilities",
issn = "1745-0101",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bridge over the river crime

T2 - mobility and the policing of organised crime

AU - Hedley-Penna, Susan

AU - Kirby, Stuart

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This paper examines the significant disparity between the mobility of organised crime and the mobility of law enforcement through the use of Kaufmann’s (2002) three categories of motility: access, skills and appropriation. It argues that the differential mobility of organised crime and law enforcement can be accounted for by the differential insertion of these groups of actors into ‘the practice and politics of market liberalisation and the practice and politics of market criminalisation’, and suggests that it is possible to view each of these as inhabiting ‘different modernities’. It concludes that whilst mobility systems are critical to understanding the movement of these groups of actors, these systems are themselves embedded within different institutional structures that shape the opportunities to be mobile, in particular economic and political structures.

AB - This paper examines the significant disparity between the mobility of organised crime and the mobility of law enforcement through the use of Kaufmann’s (2002) three categories of motility: access, skills and appropriation. It argues that the differential mobility of organised crime and law enforcement can be accounted for by the differential insertion of these groups of actors into ‘the practice and politics of market liberalisation and the practice and politics of market criminalisation’, and suggests that it is possible to view each of these as inhabiting ‘different modernities’. It concludes that whilst mobility systems are critical to understanding the movement of these groups of actors, these systems are themselves embedded within different institutional structures that shape the opportunities to be mobile, in particular economic and political structures.

KW - mobility

KW - organised crime

KW - Enterprise crime

KW - Policing

KW - Illicit flows

U2 - 10.1080/17450101.2012.705508

DO - 10.1080/17450101.2012.705508

M3 - Journal article

VL - 8

SP - 487

EP - 505

JO - Mobilities

JF - Mobilities

SN - 1745-0101

IS - 4

ER -