Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Building trust between Learning Designers and S...

Electronic data

  • 2024Lovephd

    Final published version, 3.72 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Building trust between Learning Designers and Subject Matter Experts in online course development: A case study

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Published

Standard

Building trust between Learning Designers and Subject Matter Experts in online course development: A case study. / Love, David.
Lancaster University, 2025. 331 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Love D. Building trust between Learning Designers and Subject Matter Experts in online course development: A case study. Lancaster University, 2025. 331 p. doi: 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2604

Author

Bibtex

@phdthesis{2990928e49c24a1883e89f3f2e270682,
title = "Building trust between Learning Designers and Subject Matter Experts in online course development: A case study",
abstract = "This thesis examines the trust dynamics between Learning Designers (LD) and Subject Matter Experts (SME) in online course development within Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) environments. This research is underpinned by Wenger{\textquoteright}s Communities of Practice (CoP) framework (1998) overlaid with an adapted version of Martins and Baptista Nunes' Conditional/Consequential Matrix (2016) along with definitions of trust. The methodology comprises a case study with interviews, and a focus group.I conclude the research findings with the introduction of a new model which I have called T.I.M.E. (Trust Integration Model for Educators), a framework for the cultivation and integration of trust, emphasising continuous communication, feedback, and collaboration between LDs and SMEs. Trust is crucial for effective collaboration in TEL contexts. This research shows how initial trust experiences are shaped by multiple interactions, including prior collaborations, communication efficacy, mutual understanding, and resistance to change. As collaborations mature, trust (cognitive and affective) manifests through collective values, open communication, adaptability, and a mutual commitment to shared goals.This research emphasises the significance of role clarification and available support mechanisms while establishing and following procedures or guidelines that build relationships and create and maintain trust. The T.I.M.E. model provides a structure to navigate challenges and offers potential applications across Higher Education (HE), Further Education (FE), and workplace Learning and Development (L&D). It addresses issues such as resistance to technological change, communication gaps, and internal hierarchies. The model aims to integrate trust within the broader CoP of LDs and SMEs, as well as the quasi-communities that evolve through institutional collaboration. This area has been under-researched, and the data collected, along with the analysis, combined with the T.I.M.E. model, I offer as new original knowledge.Keywords:Case Study; Trust Dynamics; Trust Building Strategies; Online Course Development; TEL; Communities of Practice; Trust Integration Model for Educators (T.I.M.E.); HE; FE; L&D; Interdisciplinary Collaboration; Social Capital.",
keywords = "Case Study, Trust Dynamics, Trust Building Strategies, Online Course Development, Technology Enhanced Learning, TEL, Trust Integration Model for Educators (T.I.M.E.), Higher Education, Further Education, Learning and Development, HE, FE, L&D, Interdisciplinary Collaboration, Social Capital",
author = "David Love",
year = "2025",
doi = "10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2604",
language = "English",
publisher = "Lancaster University",
school = "Lancaster University",

}

RIS

TY - BOOK

T1 - Building trust between Learning Designers and Subject Matter Experts in online course development

T2 - A case study

AU - Love, David

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - This thesis examines the trust dynamics between Learning Designers (LD) and Subject Matter Experts (SME) in online course development within Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) environments. This research is underpinned by Wenger’s Communities of Practice (CoP) framework (1998) overlaid with an adapted version of Martins and Baptista Nunes' Conditional/Consequential Matrix (2016) along with definitions of trust. The methodology comprises a case study with interviews, and a focus group.I conclude the research findings with the introduction of a new model which I have called T.I.M.E. (Trust Integration Model for Educators), a framework for the cultivation and integration of trust, emphasising continuous communication, feedback, and collaboration between LDs and SMEs. Trust is crucial for effective collaboration in TEL contexts. This research shows how initial trust experiences are shaped by multiple interactions, including prior collaborations, communication efficacy, mutual understanding, and resistance to change. As collaborations mature, trust (cognitive and affective) manifests through collective values, open communication, adaptability, and a mutual commitment to shared goals.This research emphasises the significance of role clarification and available support mechanisms while establishing and following procedures or guidelines that build relationships and create and maintain trust. The T.I.M.E. model provides a structure to navigate challenges and offers potential applications across Higher Education (HE), Further Education (FE), and workplace Learning and Development (L&D). It addresses issues such as resistance to technological change, communication gaps, and internal hierarchies. The model aims to integrate trust within the broader CoP of LDs and SMEs, as well as the quasi-communities that evolve through institutional collaboration. This area has been under-researched, and the data collected, along with the analysis, combined with the T.I.M.E. model, I offer as new original knowledge.Keywords:Case Study; Trust Dynamics; Trust Building Strategies; Online Course Development; TEL; Communities of Practice; Trust Integration Model for Educators (T.I.M.E.); HE; FE; L&D; Interdisciplinary Collaboration; Social Capital.

AB - This thesis examines the trust dynamics between Learning Designers (LD) and Subject Matter Experts (SME) in online course development within Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) environments. This research is underpinned by Wenger’s Communities of Practice (CoP) framework (1998) overlaid with an adapted version of Martins and Baptista Nunes' Conditional/Consequential Matrix (2016) along with definitions of trust. The methodology comprises a case study with interviews, and a focus group.I conclude the research findings with the introduction of a new model which I have called T.I.M.E. (Trust Integration Model for Educators), a framework for the cultivation and integration of trust, emphasising continuous communication, feedback, and collaboration between LDs and SMEs. Trust is crucial for effective collaboration in TEL contexts. This research shows how initial trust experiences are shaped by multiple interactions, including prior collaborations, communication efficacy, mutual understanding, and resistance to change. As collaborations mature, trust (cognitive and affective) manifests through collective values, open communication, adaptability, and a mutual commitment to shared goals.This research emphasises the significance of role clarification and available support mechanisms while establishing and following procedures or guidelines that build relationships and create and maintain trust. The T.I.M.E. model provides a structure to navigate challenges and offers potential applications across Higher Education (HE), Further Education (FE), and workplace Learning and Development (L&D). It addresses issues such as resistance to technological change, communication gaps, and internal hierarchies. The model aims to integrate trust within the broader CoP of LDs and SMEs, as well as the quasi-communities that evolve through institutional collaboration. This area has been under-researched, and the data collected, along with the analysis, combined with the T.I.M.E. model, I offer as new original knowledge.Keywords:Case Study; Trust Dynamics; Trust Building Strategies; Online Course Development; TEL; Communities of Practice; Trust Integration Model for Educators (T.I.M.E.); HE; FE; L&D; Interdisciplinary Collaboration; Social Capital.

KW - Case Study

KW - Trust Dynamics

KW - Trust Building Strategies

KW - Online Course Development

KW - Technology Enhanced Learning

KW - TEL

KW - Trust Integration Model for Educators (T.I.M.E.)

KW - Higher Education

KW - Further Education

KW - Learning and Development

KW - HE

KW - FE

KW - L&D

KW - Interdisciplinary Collaboration

KW - Social Capital

U2 - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2604

DO - 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/2604

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

PB - Lancaster University

ER -