Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Can Politics Explain Contracting Out?

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Can Politics Explain Contracting Out?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print

Standard

Can Politics Explain Contracting Out? / Abbott, Andrew; Nandeibam, Shasikanta; O'Shea, Lucy.
In: Economics & Politics, 12.05.2025.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Abbott, A, Nandeibam, S & O'Shea, L 2025, 'Can Politics Explain Contracting Out?', Economics & Politics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12349

APA

Abbott, A., Nandeibam, S., & O'Shea, L. (2025). Can Politics Explain Contracting Out? Economics & Politics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12349

Vancouver

Abbott A, Nandeibam S, O'Shea L. Can Politics Explain Contracting Out? Economics & Politics. 2025 May 12. Epub 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1111/ecpo.12349

Author

Abbott, Andrew ; Nandeibam, Shasikanta ; O'Shea, Lucy. / Can Politics Explain Contracting Out?. In: Economics & Politics. 2025.

Bibtex

@article{aad8e0ac47f94426a261b8bc7c3d8655,
title = "Can Politics Explain Contracting Out?",
abstract = "The theoretical literature suggests that political ideology matters in the decision to contract out public sector services, whereas the empirical literature is divided. We seek to explain the divide in the empirical literature by providing a link from theory to our empirical analysis by describing the nature of political competition. Using the number of seats in English local government as a measure of political ideology, we find that those governments dominated by Conservative party members have a higher likelihood of contracting out, whereas the opposite is true for the Greens. We also investigate the marginal effect of a Conservative seat. Our results suggest that local governments are more likely to contract out waste management and recycling services, the greater the number of seats that are controlled by the right‐wing party (Conservatives). However, an additional Conservative seat seems to have a stronger positive influence when one of the other opposition parties (the Liberal Democrats) is controlling the local legislature rather than the Conservative themselves.",
keywords = "privatization, ideology, waste management, contracting out, local government",
author = "Andrew Abbott and Shasikanta Nandeibam and Lucy O'Shea",
year = "2025",
month = may,
day = "12",
doi = "10.1111/ecpo.12349",
language = "English",
journal = "Economics & Politics",
issn = "0954-1985",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can Politics Explain Contracting Out?

AU - Abbott, Andrew

AU - Nandeibam, Shasikanta

AU - O'Shea, Lucy

PY - 2025/5/12

Y1 - 2025/5/12

N2 - The theoretical literature suggests that political ideology matters in the decision to contract out public sector services, whereas the empirical literature is divided. We seek to explain the divide in the empirical literature by providing a link from theory to our empirical analysis by describing the nature of political competition. Using the number of seats in English local government as a measure of political ideology, we find that those governments dominated by Conservative party members have a higher likelihood of contracting out, whereas the opposite is true for the Greens. We also investigate the marginal effect of a Conservative seat. Our results suggest that local governments are more likely to contract out waste management and recycling services, the greater the number of seats that are controlled by the right‐wing party (Conservatives). However, an additional Conservative seat seems to have a stronger positive influence when one of the other opposition parties (the Liberal Democrats) is controlling the local legislature rather than the Conservative themselves.

AB - The theoretical literature suggests that political ideology matters in the decision to contract out public sector services, whereas the empirical literature is divided. We seek to explain the divide in the empirical literature by providing a link from theory to our empirical analysis by describing the nature of political competition. Using the number of seats in English local government as a measure of political ideology, we find that those governments dominated by Conservative party members have a higher likelihood of contracting out, whereas the opposite is true for the Greens. We also investigate the marginal effect of a Conservative seat. Our results suggest that local governments are more likely to contract out waste management and recycling services, the greater the number of seats that are controlled by the right‐wing party (Conservatives). However, an additional Conservative seat seems to have a stronger positive influence when one of the other opposition parties (the Liberal Democrats) is controlling the local legislature rather than the Conservative themselves.

KW - privatization

KW - ideology

KW - waste management

KW - contracting out

KW - local government

U2 - 10.1111/ecpo.12349

DO - 10.1111/ecpo.12349

M3 - Journal article

JO - Economics & Politics

JF - Economics & Politics

SN - 0954-1985

ER -