Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Capability failures and corrosive disadvantage ...

Electronic data

  • manuscript_jan_21

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Geographical Review on 3rd March 2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00167428.2021.1890995

    Accepted author manuscript, 368 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 3/09/22

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Capability failures and corrosive disadvantage in a violent rainforest metropolis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

E-pub ahead of print
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>3/03/2021
<mark>Journal</mark>Geographical Review
Number of pages21
Publication StatusE-pub ahead of print
Early online date3/03/21
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Governments continue to narrowly equate improved well-being with economic growth, contrary to decades of development scholarship. The capabilities approach instead emphasizes freedom and what individuals are able to do and to be within society. However, it underplays structural determinants of social inequities and says little about violence, a dominant problem in metropolitan areas of Latin America. Framing our analysis around capabilities and theorizing on disadvantage, we examine experiences of inequity and violence in Manaus, a metropolis in the Brazilian Amazon. We show how the threat of physical violence is highly corrosive because it underpins a cluster of disadvantage which profoundly impacts central capabilities including emotions, bodily integrity and affiliation. Social isolation is commonplace because interactions are perceived as risks rather than pathways to mutual recognition. Violence begets violence in low-income neighbourhoods and this constrains capabilities, causes shame and indignity, and limits potential for self-realization. Policy-makers should address how disadvantaged people feel about themselves, relate to others and are able to decide how to conduct their daily lives.

Bibliographic note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Geographical Review on 3rd March 2021, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00167428.2021.1890995