Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Capturing contextual effects in spectro-tempora...

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Capturing contextual effects in spectro-temporal receptive fields

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Capturing contextual effects in spectro-temporal receptive fields. / Westö, Johan; May, Patrick.
In: Hearing Research, Vol. 339, 09.2016, p. 195-210.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Westö J, May P. Capturing contextual effects in spectro-temporal receptive fields. Hearing Research. 2016 Sept;339:195-210. Epub 2016 Jul 27. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.07.012

Author

Westö, Johan ; May, Patrick. / Capturing contextual effects in spectro-temporal receptive fields. In: Hearing Research. 2016 ; Vol. 339. pp. 195-210.

Bibtex

@article{ae3470ef9a5d418fb0a94b000609b96f,
title = "Capturing contextual effects in spectro-temporal receptive fields",
abstract = "Spectro-temporal receptive fields (STRFs) are thought to provide descriptive images of the computations performed by neurons along the auditory pathway. However, their validity can be questioned because they rely on a set of assumptions that are probably not fulfilled by real neurons exhibiting contextual effects, that is, nonlinear interactions in the time or frequency dimension that cannot be described with a linear filter. We used a novel approach to investigate how a variety of contextual effects, due to facilitating nonlinear interactions and synaptic depression, affect different STRF models, and if these effects can be captured with a context field (CF). Contextual effects were incorporated in simulated networks of spiking neurons, allowing one to define the true STRFs of the neurons. This, in turn, made it possible to evaluate the performance of each STRF model by comparing the estimations with the true STRFs. We found that currently used STRF models are particularly poor at estimating inhibitory regions. Specifically, contextual effects make estimated STRFs dependent on stimulus density in a contrasting fashion: inhibitory regions are underestimated at lower densities while artificial inhibitory regions emerge at higher densities. The CF was found to provide a solution to this dilemma, but only when it is used together with a generalized linear model. Our results therefore highlight the limitations of the traditional STRF approach and provide useful recipes for how different STRF models and stimuli can be used to arrive at reliable quantifications of neural computations in the presence of contextual effects. The results therefore push the purpose of STRF analysis from simply finding an optimal stimulus toward describing context-dependent computations of neurons along the auditory pathway.",
author = "Johan West{\"o} and Patrick May",
year = "2016",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1016/j.heares.2016.07.012",
language = "English",
volume = "339",
pages = "195--210",
journal = "Hearing Research",
issn = "0378-5955",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Capturing contextual effects in spectro-temporal receptive fields

AU - Westö, Johan

AU - May, Patrick

PY - 2016/9

Y1 - 2016/9

N2 - Spectro-temporal receptive fields (STRFs) are thought to provide descriptive images of the computations performed by neurons along the auditory pathway. However, their validity can be questioned because they rely on a set of assumptions that are probably not fulfilled by real neurons exhibiting contextual effects, that is, nonlinear interactions in the time or frequency dimension that cannot be described with a linear filter. We used a novel approach to investigate how a variety of contextual effects, due to facilitating nonlinear interactions and synaptic depression, affect different STRF models, and if these effects can be captured with a context field (CF). Contextual effects were incorporated in simulated networks of spiking neurons, allowing one to define the true STRFs of the neurons. This, in turn, made it possible to evaluate the performance of each STRF model by comparing the estimations with the true STRFs. We found that currently used STRF models are particularly poor at estimating inhibitory regions. Specifically, contextual effects make estimated STRFs dependent on stimulus density in a contrasting fashion: inhibitory regions are underestimated at lower densities while artificial inhibitory regions emerge at higher densities. The CF was found to provide a solution to this dilemma, but only when it is used together with a generalized linear model. Our results therefore highlight the limitations of the traditional STRF approach and provide useful recipes for how different STRF models and stimuli can be used to arrive at reliable quantifications of neural computations in the presence of contextual effects. The results therefore push the purpose of STRF analysis from simply finding an optimal stimulus toward describing context-dependent computations of neurons along the auditory pathway.

AB - Spectro-temporal receptive fields (STRFs) are thought to provide descriptive images of the computations performed by neurons along the auditory pathway. However, their validity can be questioned because they rely on a set of assumptions that are probably not fulfilled by real neurons exhibiting contextual effects, that is, nonlinear interactions in the time or frequency dimension that cannot be described with a linear filter. We used a novel approach to investigate how a variety of contextual effects, due to facilitating nonlinear interactions and synaptic depression, affect different STRF models, and if these effects can be captured with a context field (CF). Contextual effects were incorporated in simulated networks of spiking neurons, allowing one to define the true STRFs of the neurons. This, in turn, made it possible to evaluate the performance of each STRF model by comparing the estimations with the true STRFs. We found that currently used STRF models are particularly poor at estimating inhibitory regions. Specifically, contextual effects make estimated STRFs dependent on stimulus density in a contrasting fashion: inhibitory regions are underestimated at lower densities while artificial inhibitory regions emerge at higher densities. The CF was found to provide a solution to this dilemma, but only when it is used together with a generalized linear model. Our results therefore highlight the limitations of the traditional STRF approach and provide useful recipes for how different STRF models and stimuli can be used to arrive at reliable quantifications of neural computations in the presence of contextual effects. The results therefore push the purpose of STRF analysis from simply finding an optimal stimulus toward describing context-dependent computations of neurons along the auditory pathway.

U2 - 10.1016/j.heares.2016.07.012

DO - 10.1016/j.heares.2016.07.012

M3 - Journal article

VL - 339

SP - 195

EP - 210

JO - Hearing Research

JF - Hearing Research

SN - 0378-5955

ER -