Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Resources, Conservation and Recycling. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 173, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105743
Accepted author manuscript, 144 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Letter › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Letter › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Carbon footprinting of anaesthetic practice - the need to consider work as done
AU - Pinder, A.
AU - Eusuf, D.
AU - Gardner, A.L.
AU - Kirk, A.
AU - Washington, S.
AU - Whitehead, K.
AU - Shelton, C.
N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Resources, Conservation and Recycling. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 173, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105743
PY - 2021/10/31
Y1 - 2021/10/31
KW - Carbon footprint
KW - Inhalational anaesthetic gases
KW - Sevoflurane
U2 - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105743
DO - 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105743
M3 - Letter
VL - 173
JO - Resources, Conservation and Recycling
JF - Resources, Conservation and Recycling
M1 - 105743
ER -