Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Cases of start-up financing
View graph of relations

Cases of start-up financing: an analysis of new venture capitalisation structures and patterns

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Cases of start-up financing: an analysis of new venture capitalisation structures and patterns. / Atherton, Andrew.
In: International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 28-47.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Atherton, A 2012, 'Cases of start-up financing: an analysis of new venture capitalisation structures and patterns', International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 28-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551211201367

APA

Vancouver

Atherton A. Cases of start-up financing: an analysis of new venture capitalisation structures and patterns. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research. 2012 Jan;18(1):28-47. doi: 10.1108/13552551211201367

Author

Atherton, Andrew. / Cases of start-up financing : an analysis of new venture capitalisation structures and patterns. In: International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research. 2012 ; Vol. 18, No. 1. pp. 28-47.

Bibtex

@article{0d7b95652b5b424aa3291442df5bbc38,
title = "Cases of start-up financing: an analysis of new venture capitalisation structures and patterns",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper seeks to understand the dynamics of new venture financing across 20 business start-ups. Design/methodology/approach: A total of 20 cases were explored, via initial discussions with the founder(s), and follow-up contact to confirm sources of financing acquired during new venture creation. This approach was adopted because of the challenges associated with acquiring full details of start-up financing, and in particular informal forms of new venture financing. Findings: Significant variation in, and scale of, new venture financing was identified. In multiple cases, funding patterns did not tally with established explanations of small business financing. Research limitations/implications: The primary limitation of the analysis is the focus on a small number of individual cases. Although this allowed for more detailed analysis, it does not make the findings applicable across the small business population as a whole. New ventures acquired very different forms of finance, and in different configurations or {"}bundles{"}, so creating a wide range of start-up financing patterns and overall levels of capitalisation. This suggests that multiple factors influence founder decisions on start-up funding acquisition. It also indicates the wide divergence between highly capitalised and under-capitalised start-ups. Practical implications: Many of the new ventures were started with low levels of capitalisation, which as the literature suggests is a strong determinant of reduced prospects for survival. This suggests a possible {"}financing deficit{"}, rather than gap, for a proportion of business start-ups. Originality/value: The paper provides an alternative methodology for considering new venture financing, and as a result concludes that standard, rational theories of small business financing may not always hold for new ventures.",
keywords = "Business formation, Business start-up, Entrepreneurship, Financing, New venture",
author = "Andrew Atherton",
year = "2012",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1108/13552551211201367",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "28--47",
journal = "International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research",
issn = "1355-2554",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cases of start-up financing

T2 - an analysis of new venture capitalisation structures and patterns

AU - Atherton, Andrew

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Purpose: This paper seeks to understand the dynamics of new venture financing across 20 business start-ups. Design/methodology/approach: A total of 20 cases were explored, via initial discussions with the founder(s), and follow-up contact to confirm sources of financing acquired during new venture creation. This approach was adopted because of the challenges associated with acquiring full details of start-up financing, and in particular informal forms of new venture financing. Findings: Significant variation in, and scale of, new venture financing was identified. In multiple cases, funding patterns did not tally with established explanations of small business financing. Research limitations/implications: The primary limitation of the analysis is the focus on a small number of individual cases. Although this allowed for more detailed analysis, it does not make the findings applicable across the small business population as a whole. New ventures acquired very different forms of finance, and in different configurations or "bundles", so creating a wide range of start-up financing patterns and overall levels of capitalisation. This suggests that multiple factors influence founder decisions on start-up funding acquisition. It also indicates the wide divergence between highly capitalised and under-capitalised start-ups. Practical implications: Many of the new ventures were started with low levels of capitalisation, which as the literature suggests is a strong determinant of reduced prospects for survival. This suggests a possible "financing deficit", rather than gap, for a proportion of business start-ups. Originality/value: The paper provides an alternative methodology for considering new venture financing, and as a result concludes that standard, rational theories of small business financing may not always hold for new ventures.

AB - Purpose: This paper seeks to understand the dynamics of new venture financing across 20 business start-ups. Design/methodology/approach: A total of 20 cases were explored, via initial discussions with the founder(s), and follow-up contact to confirm sources of financing acquired during new venture creation. This approach was adopted because of the challenges associated with acquiring full details of start-up financing, and in particular informal forms of new venture financing. Findings: Significant variation in, and scale of, new venture financing was identified. In multiple cases, funding patterns did not tally with established explanations of small business financing. Research limitations/implications: The primary limitation of the analysis is the focus on a small number of individual cases. Although this allowed for more detailed analysis, it does not make the findings applicable across the small business population as a whole. New ventures acquired very different forms of finance, and in different configurations or "bundles", so creating a wide range of start-up financing patterns and overall levels of capitalisation. This suggests that multiple factors influence founder decisions on start-up funding acquisition. It also indicates the wide divergence between highly capitalised and under-capitalised start-ups. Practical implications: Many of the new ventures were started with low levels of capitalisation, which as the literature suggests is a strong determinant of reduced prospects for survival. This suggests a possible "financing deficit", rather than gap, for a proportion of business start-ups. Originality/value: The paper provides an alternative methodology for considering new venture financing, and as a result concludes that standard, rational theories of small business financing may not always hold for new ventures.

KW - Business formation

KW - Business start-up

KW - Entrepreneurship

KW - Financing

KW - New venture

U2 - 10.1108/13552551211201367

DO - 10.1108/13552551211201367

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84855743880

VL - 18

SP - 28

EP - 47

JO - International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research

JF - International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research

SN - 1355-2554

IS - 1

ER -