Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Caught between the cartographic and the ethnogr...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Caught between the cartographic and the ethnographic imagination: the whereabouts of amateurs, professionals and nature in knowing biodiversity.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Caught between the cartographic and the ethnographic imagination: the whereabouts of amateurs, professionals and nature in knowing biodiversity. / Ellis, Rebecca; Waterton, Claire.

In: Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2005, p. 673-693.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{811d5796903c42f2b93ac4fc61bf8c24,
title = "Caught between the cartographic and the ethnographic imagination: the whereabouts of amateurs, professionals and nature in knowing biodiversity.",
abstract = "In this paper we document current research into new forms of public engagement presently taking place in UK biodiversity policy. This involves locating the main participants in such patterns of engagement; namely nature, amateur naturalists, and professional biologists and conservationists. Two interwoven and mutually interdependent perspectives or {\textquoteleft}imaginaries{\textquoteright}—the {\textquoteleft}cartographic{\textquoteright} and the {\textquoteleft}ethnographic{\textquoteright}—are presented in the paper to explore the shaping and interpretation of such new forms of engagement. However, in this context the interest lies in the ways in which either perspective is foregrounded or backgrounded by the different parties involved. The described shifts and movements of a range of actors and processes being studied demonstrate the fluidity and instability of networks of {\textquoteleft}knowing nature well{\textquoteright}, whose stability is often assumed. The tracing of two constants—expertise and exchange—within networks inhabited by nature and by amateur and professional naturalists allows for an exploration of ways in which social/natural inclusions and exclusions occur in new participatory practices designed as part of biodiversity action planning.",
author = "Rebecca Ellis and Claire Waterton",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1068/d353t",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "673--693",
journal = "Environment and Planning D: Society and Space",
issn = "0263-7758",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Caught between the cartographic and the ethnographic imagination: the whereabouts of amateurs, professionals and nature in knowing biodiversity.

AU - Ellis, Rebecca

AU - Waterton, Claire

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - In this paper we document current research into new forms of public engagement presently taking place in UK biodiversity policy. This involves locating the main participants in such patterns of engagement; namely nature, amateur naturalists, and professional biologists and conservationists. Two interwoven and mutually interdependent perspectives or ‘imaginaries’—the ‘cartographic’ and the ‘ethnographic’—are presented in the paper to explore the shaping and interpretation of such new forms of engagement. However, in this context the interest lies in the ways in which either perspective is foregrounded or backgrounded by the different parties involved. The described shifts and movements of a range of actors and processes being studied demonstrate the fluidity and instability of networks of ‘knowing nature well’, whose stability is often assumed. The tracing of two constants—expertise and exchange—within networks inhabited by nature and by amateur and professional naturalists allows for an exploration of ways in which social/natural inclusions and exclusions occur in new participatory practices designed as part of biodiversity action planning.

AB - In this paper we document current research into new forms of public engagement presently taking place in UK biodiversity policy. This involves locating the main participants in such patterns of engagement; namely nature, amateur naturalists, and professional biologists and conservationists. Two interwoven and mutually interdependent perspectives or ‘imaginaries’—the ‘cartographic’ and the ‘ethnographic’—are presented in the paper to explore the shaping and interpretation of such new forms of engagement. However, in this context the interest lies in the ways in which either perspective is foregrounded or backgrounded by the different parties involved. The described shifts and movements of a range of actors and processes being studied demonstrate the fluidity and instability of networks of ‘knowing nature well’, whose stability is often assumed. The tracing of two constants—expertise and exchange—within networks inhabited by nature and by amateur and professional naturalists allows for an exploration of ways in which social/natural inclusions and exclusions occur in new participatory practices designed as part of biodiversity action planning.

U2 - 10.1068/d353t

DO - 10.1068/d353t

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 673

EP - 693

JO - Environment and Planning D: Society and Space

JF - Environment and Planning D: Society and Space

SN - 0263-7758

IS - 5

ER -