Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Ceci n’est pas un argument appropré (this is no...

Research

Associated organisational unit

Electronic data

  • Ceci n’est pas un argument appropré (this is not a proper argument)

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Theatre and Performance on 17/11/2015, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14682761.2015.1111012

    Accepted author manuscript, 254 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Ceci n’est pas un argument appropré (this is not a proper argument)

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Ceci n’est pas un argument appropré (this is not a proper argument). / Harris, Geraldine Mary.
In: Studies in Theatre and Performance, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2016, p. 52-57.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Harris, GM 2016, 'Ceci n’est pas un argument appropré (this is not a proper argument)', Studies in Theatre and Performance, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 52-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682761.2015.1111012

APA

Harris, G. M. (2016). Ceci n’est pas un argument appropré (this is not a proper argument). Studies in Theatre and Performance, 36(1), 52-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682761.2015.1111012

Vancouver

Harris GM. Ceci n’est pas un argument appropré (this is not a proper argument). Studies in Theatre and Performance. 2016;36(1):52-57. Epub 2015 Nov 17. doi: 10.1080/14682761.2015.1111012

Author

Harris, Geraldine Mary. / Ceci n’est pas un argument appropré (this is not a proper argument). In: Studies in Theatre and Performance. 2016 ; Vol. 36, No. 1. pp. 52-57.

Bibtex

@article{b40f47a59a31465e9ea0876bad635191,
title = "Ceci n{\textquoteright}est pas un argument appropr{\'e} (this is not a proper argument)",
abstract = "This provocation poses questions of various sizes {\textquoteleft}inspired{\textquoteright} by some of the written publications that have theorised the concept of Practice as Research and drawing on lessons learnt from supervising PhD{\textquoteright}s (with and without PaR). It consists of {\textquoteleft}musing{\textquoteright} rather than a proper argument and makes reference to feminism. Some readers might find both of these things very irritating. Throughout the course of its musing, questions asked include: {\textquoteleft}Is it acceptable to start a sentence with {\textquoteleft}And{\textquoteright} in academic writing?; {\textquoteleft}What does and does not have the status of {\textquoteleft}theory{\textquoteright}? And who does and does not have the status of a theorist? and {\textquoteleft}What is a proper argument?{\textquoteright} No answers are provided and no conclusions drawn.",
author = "Harris, {Geraldine Mary}",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Theatre and Performance on 17/11/2015, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14682761.2015.1111012",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/14682761.2015.1111012",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "52--57",
journal = "Studies in Theatre and Performance",
issn = "1468-2761",
publisher = "Intellect Books",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ceci n’est pas un argument appropré (this is not a proper argument)

AU - Harris, Geraldine Mary

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Theatre and Performance on 17/11/2015, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14682761.2015.1111012

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This provocation poses questions of various sizes ‘inspired’ by some of the written publications that have theorised the concept of Practice as Research and drawing on lessons learnt from supervising PhD’s (with and without PaR). It consists of ‘musing’ rather than a proper argument and makes reference to feminism. Some readers might find both of these things very irritating. Throughout the course of its musing, questions asked include: ‘Is it acceptable to start a sentence with ‘And’ in academic writing?; ‘What does and does not have the status of ‘theory’? And who does and does not have the status of a theorist? and ‘What is a proper argument?’ No answers are provided and no conclusions drawn.

AB - This provocation poses questions of various sizes ‘inspired’ by some of the written publications that have theorised the concept of Practice as Research and drawing on lessons learnt from supervising PhD’s (with and without PaR). It consists of ‘musing’ rather than a proper argument and makes reference to feminism. Some readers might find both of these things very irritating. Throughout the course of its musing, questions asked include: ‘Is it acceptable to start a sentence with ‘And’ in academic writing?; ‘What does and does not have the status of ‘theory’? And who does and does not have the status of a theorist? and ‘What is a proper argument?’ No answers are provided and no conclusions drawn.

U2 - 10.1080/14682761.2015.1111012

DO - 10.1080/14682761.2015.1111012

M3 - Journal article

VL - 36

SP - 52

EP - 57

JO - Studies in Theatre and Performance

JF - Studies in Theatre and Performance

SN - 1468-2761

IS - 1

ER -