Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Censorship as Performance – The case of a Singa...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Censorship as Performance – The case of a Singapore Reality TV Show

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Published

Standard

Censorship as Performance – The case of a Singapore Reality TV Show. / Fong, Siao Yuong.
Media, Margins and Popular Culture. ed. / Einar Thorsen; Heather Savigny; Jenny Alexander; Daniel Jackson. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. p. 202-215.

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Harvard

Fong, SY 2015, Censorship as Performance – The case of a Singapore Reality TV Show. in E Thorsen, H Savigny, J Alexander & D Jackson (eds), Media, Margins and Popular Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 202-215. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137512819_14

APA

Fong, S. Y. (2015). Censorship as Performance – The case of a Singapore Reality TV Show. In E. Thorsen, H. Savigny, J. Alexander, & D. Jackson (Eds.), Media, Margins and Popular Culture (pp. 202-215). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137512819_14

Vancouver

Fong SY. Censorship as Performance – The case of a Singapore Reality TV Show. In Thorsen E, Savigny H, Alexander J, Jackson D, editors, Media, Margins and Popular Culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 2015. p. 202-215 doi: 10.1057/9781137512819_14

Author

Fong, Siao Yuong. / Censorship as Performance – The case of a Singapore Reality TV Show. Media, Margins and Popular Culture. editor / Einar Thorsen ; Heather Savigny ; Jenny Alexander ; Daniel Jackson. London : Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. pp. 202-215

Bibtex

@inbook{a3d69ad512f84e6db326ccae63a704e4,
title = "Censorship as Performance – The case of a Singapore Reality TV Show",
abstract = "Singapore is known for its tight censorship. Index on Censorship named Singapore {\textquoteleft}censorship city{\textquoteright} in 2009 (Index on Censorship, 2009); and in 2014, Singapore fell to its record lowest position of 150th out of 180 in the world press freedom index (Reporters Without Borders, 2014). Many scholars have written about the widespread censorship in the nation state and its media industry (Kuo and Chen, 1983; Tan and Soh, 1994). Singaporean media scholar Lee (2007: 62) argued that media producers will never be able to alleviate their fears and self-censorship unless the authorities {\textquoteleft}rescind the OB [out-of-bound] markers and other open-ended laws{\textquoteright}. George{\textquoteright}s (2005: 11) theory of {\textquoteleft}calibrated coercion{\textquoteright} also postulated that the Singaporean state{\textquoteright}s use of overt repression is calibrated {\textquoteleft}for maximum effectiveness at minimum cost{\textquoteright}.",
keywords = "Disciplininary Boundary, Symbolic Action, Reality Television, PublicService Broadcast, Censorship Issue",
author = "Fong, {Siao Yuong}",
year = "2015",
month = sep,
day = "9",
doi = "10.1057/9781137512819_14",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-349-56631-0",
pages = "202--215",
editor = "Einar Thorsen and Heather Savigny and Jenny Alexander and Daniel Jackson",
booktitle = "Media, Margins and Popular Culture",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Censorship as Performance – The case of a Singapore Reality TV Show

AU - Fong, Siao Yuong

PY - 2015/9/9

Y1 - 2015/9/9

N2 - Singapore is known for its tight censorship. Index on Censorship named Singapore ‘censorship city’ in 2009 (Index on Censorship, 2009); and in 2014, Singapore fell to its record lowest position of 150th out of 180 in the world press freedom index (Reporters Without Borders, 2014). Many scholars have written about the widespread censorship in the nation state and its media industry (Kuo and Chen, 1983; Tan and Soh, 1994). Singaporean media scholar Lee (2007: 62) argued that media producers will never be able to alleviate their fears and self-censorship unless the authorities ‘rescind the OB [out-of-bound] markers and other open-ended laws’. George’s (2005: 11) theory of ‘calibrated coercion’ also postulated that the Singaporean state’s use of overt repression is calibrated ‘for maximum effectiveness at minimum cost’.

AB - Singapore is known for its tight censorship. Index on Censorship named Singapore ‘censorship city’ in 2009 (Index on Censorship, 2009); and in 2014, Singapore fell to its record lowest position of 150th out of 180 in the world press freedom index (Reporters Without Borders, 2014). Many scholars have written about the widespread censorship in the nation state and its media industry (Kuo and Chen, 1983; Tan and Soh, 1994). Singaporean media scholar Lee (2007: 62) argued that media producers will never be able to alleviate their fears and self-censorship unless the authorities ‘rescind the OB [out-of-bound] markers and other open-ended laws’. George’s (2005: 11) theory of ‘calibrated coercion’ also postulated that the Singaporean state’s use of overt repression is calibrated ‘for maximum effectiveness at minimum cost’.

KW - Disciplininary Boundary

KW - Symbolic Action

KW - Reality Television

KW - PublicService Broadcast

KW - Censorship Issue

U2 - 10.1057/9781137512819_14

DO - 10.1057/9781137512819_14

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-1-349-56631-0

SP - 202

EP - 215

BT - Media, Margins and Popular Culture

A2 - Thorsen, Einar

A2 - Savigny, Heather

A2 - Alexander, Jenny

A2 - Jackson, Daniel

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

CY - London

ER -