Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Changing channels?

Electronic data

  • Lanning et al. (in press) - Changing channels_ A comparison of Fox and MSNBC in 2012, 2016, and 2020

    Rights statement: 12m

    Accepted author manuscript, 909 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 1/01/50

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

View graph of relations

Changing channels?: A comparison of Fox and MSNBC in 2012, 2016, and 2020

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Forthcoming
  • Kevin Lanning
  • Geoffrey Wetherell
  • Evan A. Warfel
  • Ryan L Boyd
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>14/07/2021
<mark>Journal</mark>Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (ASAP)
Publication StatusAccepted/In press
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

We compare the contents of Fox and MSNBC weekday evening telecasts using natural language analysis with the Linguistic Inventory Word Count (LIWC) and sociopolitical dictionaries tapping into moral foundations, values, grievances, and personality. Across time, the two networks differed substantially across many constructs, particularly those from the LIWC. The core of the difference between the networks was captured by a four-component measure which we labeled Personalizing vs. Formal speech. Scores on this measure were particularly volatile during 2019 and 2020, a period which included Trump’s first impeachment, the beginning of the COVID pandemic, and the 2020 presidential campaign. In comparison with prior presidential election years, only MSNBC showed a drop in positive emotions in 2020, while both networks increased in the use of communal and analytic language. Contrary to our expectations, the language style of the two networks did not demonstrate increasing divergence over time.