Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Child interviewing practices in Canada

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Child interviewing practices in Canada: a box score from field observations

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Child interviewing practices in Canada: a box score from field observations. / Luther, Kirk; Snook, Brent; Barron, Todd et al.
In: Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 3, 18.09.2015, p. 204-212.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Luther, K, Snook, B, Barron, T & Lamb, ME 2015, 'Child interviewing practices in Canada: a box score from field observations', Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 204-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-014-9149-y

APA

Luther, K., Snook, B., Barron, T., & Lamb, M. E. (2015). Child interviewing practices in Canada: a box score from field observations. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30(3), 204-212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-014-9149-y

Vancouver

Luther K, Snook B, Barron T, Lamb ME. Child interviewing practices in Canada: a box score from field observations. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 2015 Sept 18;30(3):204-212. Epub 2014 Apr 22. doi: 10.1007/s11896-014-9149-y

Author

Luther, Kirk ; Snook, Brent ; Barron, Todd et al. / Child interviewing practices in Canada : a box score from field observations. In: Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 3. pp. 204-212.

Bibtex

@article{7a5db0b0faf148f1920b4c0b048c18c9,
title = "Child interviewing practices in Canada: a box score from field observations",
abstract = "A field study of interviews with child witnesses and alleged victims was conducted. The National Institute of Child and Human Development (NICHD) codebook served as the framework to examine a sample of 45 interviews with children ranging in age from three to 16. Results showed that pre-substantive practices were observed rarely. An examination of the questions asked during the substantive phase revealed that, on average, 40% were option-posing, 30% were directive, and 8% were invitations. Invitations produced the longest interviewee responses and the largest number of details that were central to the investigation. The implications of these findings for interviewing practices and policy are discussed.",
keywords = "Child interviewing, NICHD protocol, field study",
author = "Kirk Luther and Brent Snook and Todd Barron and Lamb, {Michael E.}",
year = "2015",
month = sep,
day = "18",
doi = "10.1007/s11896-014-9149-y",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "204--212",
journal = "Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology",
issn = "0882-0783",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Child interviewing practices in Canada

T2 - a box score from field observations

AU - Luther, Kirk

AU - Snook, Brent

AU - Barron, Todd

AU - Lamb, Michael E.

PY - 2015/9/18

Y1 - 2015/9/18

N2 - A field study of interviews with child witnesses and alleged victims was conducted. The National Institute of Child and Human Development (NICHD) codebook served as the framework to examine a sample of 45 interviews with children ranging in age from three to 16. Results showed that pre-substantive practices were observed rarely. An examination of the questions asked during the substantive phase revealed that, on average, 40% were option-posing, 30% were directive, and 8% were invitations. Invitations produced the longest interviewee responses and the largest number of details that were central to the investigation. The implications of these findings for interviewing practices and policy are discussed.

AB - A field study of interviews with child witnesses and alleged victims was conducted. The National Institute of Child and Human Development (NICHD) codebook served as the framework to examine a sample of 45 interviews with children ranging in age from three to 16. Results showed that pre-substantive practices were observed rarely. An examination of the questions asked during the substantive phase revealed that, on average, 40% were option-posing, 30% were directive, and 8% were invitations. Invitations produced the longest interviewee responses and the largest number of details that were central to the investigation. The implications of these findings for interviewing practices and policy are discussed.

KW - Child interviewing

KW - NICHD protocol

KW - field study

U2 - 10.1007/s11896-014-9149-y

DO - 10.1007/s11896-014-9149-y

M3 - Journal article

VL - 30

SP - 204

EP - 212

JO - Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology

JF - Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology

SN - 0882-0783

IS - 3

ER -