Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Childhood leukaemia near British nuclear instal...
View graph of relations

Childhood leukaemia near British nuclear installations: methodological issues and recent results

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Childhood leukaemia near British nuclear installations: methodological issues and recent results. / Bithell, John F.; Keegan, Thomas J.; Kroll, M. E. et al.
In: Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Vol. 132, No. 2, 2008, p. 191-197.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Bithell, JF, Keegan, TJ, Kroll, ME, Murphy, MFG & Vincent, TJ 2008, 'Childhood leukaemia near British nuclear installations: methodological issues and recent results', Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 191-197. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncn254

APA

Bithell, J. F., Keegan, T. J., Kroll, M. E., Murphy, M. F. G., & Vincent, T. J. (2008). Childhood leukaemia near British nuclear installations: methodological issues and recent results. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 132(2), 191-197. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncn254

Vancouver

Bithell JF, Keegan TJ, Kroll ME, Murphy MFG, Vincent TJ. Childhood leukaemia near British nuclear installations: methodological issues and recent results. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2008;132(2):191-197. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn254

Author

Bithell, John F. ; Keegan, Thomas J. ; Kroll, M. E. et al. / Childhood leukaemia near British nuclear installations : methodological issues and recent results. In: Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2008 ; Vol. 132, No. 2. pp. 191-197.

Bibtex

@article{197199b57fb34a9492f97d2f4338aca1,
title = "Childhood leukaemia near British nuclear installations: methodological issues and recent results",
abstract = "In 2008, the German Childhood Cancer Registry published the results of the Kinderkrebs in der Umgebung von Kernkraftwerken (KiKK) study of childhood cancer and leukaemia around German nuclear power stations. The positive findings appeared to conflict with the results of a recent British analysis carried out by the Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment (COMARE), published in 2005. The present paper first describes the COMARE study, which was based on data from the National Registry of Children's Tumours (NRCT); in particular, the methodology used in this study is described. Although the results of the COMARE study were negative for childhood leukaemia, this apparent discrepancy could be accounted for by a number of differences in approach, especially those relating to the distances from the power stations and the ages of the children studied. The present study was designed to match the KiKK study as far as possible. The incidence observed (18 cases within 5 km against 14.58 expected, p = 0.21) was not significantly raised. The risk estimate for proximity in the regression fitted was actually negative, though the confidence intervals involved are so wide that the difference from that reported in the KiKK study is only marginally statistically significant (p = 0.063).",
keywords = "Body Burden, Child, Environmental Exposure, Epidemiologic Studies, Great Britain, Humans, Incidence, Leukemia, Radiation-Induced, Nuclear Power Plants, Radiation Monitoring, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Young Adult",
author = "Bithell, {John F.} and Keegan, {Thomas J.} and Kroll, {M. E.} and Murphy, {M. F. G.} and Vincent, {T. J.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1093/rpd/ncn254",
language = "English",
volume = "132",
pages = "191--197",
journal = "Radiation Protection Dosimetry",
issn = "1742-3406",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Childhood leukaemia near British nuclear installations

T2 - methodological issues and recent results

AU - Bithell, John F.

AU - Keegan, Thomas J.

AU - Kroll, M. E.

AU - Murphy, M. F. G.

AU - Vincent, T. J.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - In 2008, the German Childhood Cancer Registry published the results of the Kinderkrebs in der Umgebung von Kernkraftwerken (KiKK) study of childhood cancer and leukaemia around German nuclear power stations. The positive findings appeared to conflict with the results of a recent British analysis carried out by the Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment (COMARE), published in 2005. The present paper first describes the COMARE study, which was based on data from the National Registry of Children's Tumours (NRCT); in particular, the methodology used in this study is described. Although the results of the COMARE study were negative for childhood leukaemia, this apparent discrepancy could be accounted for by a number of differences in approach, especially those relating to the distances from the power stations and the ages of the children studied. The present study was designed to match the KiKK study as far as possible. The incidence observed (18 cases within 5 km against 14.58 expected, p = 0.21) was not significantly raised. The risk estimate for proximity in the regression fitted was actually negative, though the confidence intervals involved are so wide that the difference from that reported in the KiKK study is only marginally statistically significant (p = 0.063).

AB - In 2008, the German Childhood Cancer Registry published the results of the Kinderkrebs in der Umgebung von Kernkraftwerken (KiKK) study of childhood cancer and leukaemia around German nuclear power stations. The positive findings appeared to conflict with the results of a recent British analysis carried out by the Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment (COMARE), published in 2005. The present paper first describes the COMARE study, which was based on data from the National Registry of Children's Tumours (NRCT); in particular, the methodology used in this study is described. Although the results of the COMARE study were negative for childhood leukaemia, this apparent discrepancy could be accounted for by a number of differences in approach, especially those relating to the distances from the power stations and the ages of the children studied. The present study was designed to match the KiKK study as far as possible. The incidence observed (18 cases within 5 km against 14.58 expected, p = 0.21) was not significantly raised. The risk estimate for proximity in the regression fitted was actually negative, though the confidence intervals involved are so wide that the difference from that reported in the KiKK study is only marginally statistically significant (p = 0.063).

KW - Body Burden

KW - Child

KW - Environmental Exposure

KW - Epidemiologic Studies

KW - Great Britain

KW - Humans

KW - Incidence

KW - Leukemia, Radiation-Induced

KW - Nuclear Power Plants

KW - Radiation Monitoring

KW - Risk Assessment

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1093/rpd/ncn254

DO - 10.1093/rpd/ncn254

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 18936090

VL - 132

SP - 191

EP - 197

JO - Radiation Protection Dosimetry

JF - Radiation Protection Dosimetry

SN - 1742-3406

IS - 2

ER -