Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Children see rabbit, not Peter

Electronic data

Links

View graph of relations

Children see rabbit, not Peter: Young children’s responses to an Anthropomorphic Picture Scale

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Children see rabbit, not Peter: Young children’s responses to an Anthropomorphic Picture Scale. / Russell, Samantha; Cain, Kate.
In: Assessment and Development Matters, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.06.2020, p. 13-23.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{2ad31a685bbb4997803480546e8e5d04,
title = "Children see rabbit, not Peter: Young children{\textquoteright}s responses to an Anthropomorphic Picture Scale",
abstract = "Previous research suggests that character realism influences children{\textquoteright}s responses to stories. This study explored 3- to 7-year-old children{\textquoteright}s ratings of thought, feeling, self-knowledge and intention for humans, real animals and anthropomorphised animal characters. Ratings were similar for real and anthropomorphised animals and significantly lower than those for humans. These findings may relate to the observed poorer outcomes following stories depicting anthropomorphic animals, relative to human characters. Individual differences in internal state attribution and corresponding responses to anthropomorphised narratives might be usefully explored with this scale.",
keywords = "anthropomorphism, children, stories",
author = "Samantha Russell and Kate Cain",
year = "2020",
month = jun,
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "13--23",
journal = "Assessment and Development Matters",
issn = "2040-4069",
publisher = "The British Psychological Society",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Children see rabbit, not Peter

T2 - Young children’s responses to an Anthropomorphic Picture Scale

AU - Russell, Samantha

AU - Cain, Kate

PY - 2020/6/1

Y1 - 2020/6/1

N2 - Previous research suggests that character realism influences children’s responses to stories. This study explored 3- to 7-year-old children’s ratings of thought, feeling, self-knowledge and intention for humans, real animals and anthropomorphised animal characters. Ratings were similar for real and anthropomorphised animals and significantly lower than those for humans. These findings may relate to the observed poorer outcomes following stories depicting anthropomorphic animals, relative to human characters. Individual differences in internal state attribution and corresponding responses to anthropomorphised narratives might be usefully explored with this scale.

AB - Previous research suggests that character realism influences children’s responses to stories. This study explored 3- to 7-year-old children’s ratings of thought, feeling, self-knowledge and intention for humans, real animals and anthropomorphised animal characters. Ratings were similar for real and anthropomorphised animals and significantly lower than those for humans. These findings may relate to the observed poorer outcomes following stories depicting anthropomorphic animals, relative to human characters. Individual differences in internal state attribution and corresponding responses to anthropomorphised narratives might be usefully explored with this scale.

KW - anthropomorphism

KW - children

KW - stories

M3 - Journal article

VL - 12

SP - 13

EP - 23

JO - Assessment and Development Matters

JF - Assessment and Development Matters

SN - 2040-4069

IS - 2

ER -