Rights statement: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/world-trade-review The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the World Trade Review, 16 (2), pp 159-181, 2017, © 2017 Cambridge University Press.
Accepted author manuscript, 244 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - China - HP-SSST
T2 - last part of growing pains?
AU - Ahn, Dukgeun
AU - Zanardi, Maurizio
N1 - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/world-trade-review The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the World Trade Review, 16 (2), pp 159-181, 2017, © 2017 Cambridge University Press.
PY - 2017/4
Y1 - 2017/4
N2 - In December 2012, Japan requested the establishment of a World Trade Organization (WTO) Panel regarding antidumping (AD) duties that China had imposed on high-performance stainless steel seamless tubes (HP-SSST). The European Union joined as a complainant in June 2013. To some degree, this dispute follows earlier ones involving China, as similar procedural and substantial issues were raised in previous cases. However, this was the first time that the WTO Panel rejected some important claims, only for those decisions to be reversed by the Appellate Body. Now that various rulings have clarified these legal issues, it remains to be seen if HP-SSST represents the last part of growing pains for Chinese authorities to learn about AD legal procedures.
AB - In December 2012, Japan requested the establishment of a World Trade Organization (WTO) Panel regarding antidumping (AD) duties that China had imposed on high-performance stainless steel seamless tubes (HP-SSST). The European Union joined as a complainant in June 2013. To some degree, this dispute follows earlier ones involving China, as similar procedural and substantial issues were raised in previous cases. However, this was the first time that the WTO Panel rejected some important claims, only for those decisions to be reversed by the Appellate Body. Now that various rulings have clarified these legal issues, it remains to be seen if HP-SSST represents the last part of growing pains for Chinese authorities to learn about AD legal procedures.
U2 - 10.1017/S1474745616000495
DO - 10.1017/S1474745616000495
M3 - Journal article
VL - 16
SP - 159
EP - 181
JO - World Trade Review
JF - World Trade Review
SN - 1474-7456
IS - 2
ER -