Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > China’s Rise and “Responsibility” in the 21st C...

Electronic data

Links

View graph of relations

China’s Rise and “Responsibility” in the 21st Century

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

China’s Rise and “Responsibility” in the 21st Century. / Nordin, Astrid; Smith, Graham M.

In: British Journal of Chinese Studies, Vol. 10, No. 1, 12.07.2020, p. 40-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Nordin, A & Smith, GM 2020, 'China’s Rise and “Responsibility” in the 21st Century', British Journal of Chinese Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 40-60. <https://bjocs.site/index.php/bjocs/article/view/56>

APA

Vancouver

Nordin A, Smith GM. China’s Rise and “Responsibility” in the 21st Century. British Journal of Chinese Studies. 2020 Jul 12;10(1):40-60.

Author

Nordin, Astrid ; Smith, Graham M. / China’s Rise and “Responsibility” in the 21st Century. In: British Journal of Chinese Studies. 2020 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 40-60.

Bibtex

@article{2fced57d5e5c43d0b6665f13181e9cbe,
title = "China{\textquoteright}s Rise and “Responsibility” in the 21st Century",
abstract = "In recent decades {\textquoteleft}responsibility{\textquoteright} has become a prominent idea in international political discourse. Against this backdrop, international policy and scholarly communities contemplating China{\textquoteright}s rise regularly as “whether, when, and how” China will become a “responsible” great power. This article reviews, unpacks and questions understandings of responsibility in the debates about China. One strand of these debates argue that China can become responsible by adopting and promoting the existing status quo; the other argues that China acts responsibly when it challenges the unfair hegemony of the status quo. This article argues that both of these debates operate with a remarkably similar understanding of responsibility. Whether China adopts existing rules and norms, or whether it establishes rules and norms of its own, responsibility is understood to be rule and norm compliance. The article explores the possibility of an alternative understanding of responsibility suggested by Derrida. It is argued that a Derridian approach does not dispense with rules and norms, but is conscious of the irresolvable dilemma when faced with the demands of multiple others. Such an understanding is helpful insofar as it reminds those who would call for responsibility that such responsibility, and politics itself, is more than simply following rules and maintenance of norms.",
keywords = "Responsibility, Derrida, China as a great power, Xi Jinping, Chinese thought, rules and norms",
author = "Astrid Nordin and Smith, {Graham M.}",
year = "2020",
month = jul,
day = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "40--60",
journal = "British Journal of Chinese Studies",
issn = "2048-0601",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - China’s Rise and “Responsibility” in the 21st Century

AU - Nordin, Astrid

AU - Smith, Graham M.

PY - 2020/7/12

Y1 - 2020/7/12

N2 - In recent decades ‘responsibility’ has become a prominent idea in international political discourse. Against this backdrop, international policy and scholarly communities contemplating China’s rise regularly as “whether, when, and how” China will become a “responsible” great power. This article reviews, unpacks and questions understandings of responsibility in the debates about China. One strand of these debates argue that China can become responsible by adopting and promoting the existing status quo; the other argues that China acts responsibly when it challenges the unfair hegemony of the status quo. This article argues that both of these debates operate with a remarkably similar understanding of responsibility. Whether China adopts existing rules and norms, or whether it establishes rules and norms of its own, responsibility is understood to be rule and norm compliance. The article explores the possibility of an alternative understanding of responsibility suggested by Derrida. It is argued that a Derridian approach does not dispense with rules and norms, but is conscious of the irresolvable dilemma when faced with the demands of multiple others. Such an understanding is helpful insofar as it reminds those who would call for responsibility that such responsibility, and politics itself, is more than simply following rules and maintenance of norms.

AB - In recent decades ‘responsibility’ has become a prominent idea in international political discourse. Against this backdrop, international policy and scholarly communities contemplating China’s rise regularly as “whether, when, and how” China will become a “responsible” great power. This article reviews, unpacks and questions understandings of responsibility in the debates about China. One strand of these debates argue that China can become responsible by adopting and promoting the existing status quo; the other argues that China acts responsibly when it challenges the unfair hegemony of the status quo. This article argues that both of these debates operate with a remarkably similar understanding of responsibility. Whether China adopts existing rules and norms, or whether it establishes rules and norms of its own, responsibility is understood to be rule and norm compliance. The article explores the possibility of an alternative understanding of responsibility suggested by Derrida. It is argued that a Derridian approach does not dispense with rules and norms, but is conscious of the irresolvable dilemma when faced with the demands of multiple others. Such an understanding is helpful insofar as it reminds those who would call for responsibility that such responsibility, and politics itself, is more than simply following rules and maintenance of norms.

KW - Responsibility

KW - Derrida

KW - China as a great power

KW - Xi Jinping

KW - Chinese thought

KW - rules and norms

M3 - Journal article

VL - 10

SP - 40

EP - 60

JO - British Journal of Chinese Studies

JF - British Journal of Chinese Studies

SN - 2048-0601

IS - 1

ER -