Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Class and morality
View graph of relations

Class and morality

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Published

Standard

Class and morality. / Sayer, Andrew.
Handbook of the sociology of morality. ed. / Steven Hitlin; Stephen Vaisey. New York: Springer, 2010. p. 163-178 (Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research).

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNChapter

Harvard

Sayer, A 2010, Class and morality. in S Hitlin & S Vaisey (eds), Handbook of the sociology of morality. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research, Springer, New York, pp. 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6896-8_9

APA

Sayer, A. (2010). Class and morality. In S. Hitlin, & S. Vaisey (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of morality (pp. 163-178). (Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6896-8_9

Vancouver

Sayer A. Class and morality. In Hitlin S, Vaisey S, editors, Handbook of the sociology of morality. New York: Springer. 2010. p. 163-178. (Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6896-8_9

Author

Sayer, Andrew. / Class and morality. Handbook of the sociology of morality. editor / Steven Hitlin ; Stephen Vaisey. New York : Springer, 2010. pp. 163-178 (Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research).

Bibtex

@inbook{16075e558eb143488224f1d4ab61c2e8,
title = "Class and morality",
abstract = "Class is argued to be of considerable moral significance, in relation to what people get in terms of resources and opportunities, what they contribute and achieve, who they become, how they value themselves and others, and how they behave towards others. I begin by sketching how we might conceptualise morality and class each in their own right, arguing against the dominant subjectivist and conventionalist treatment of morality in sociology, and recommending a multidimensional, largely Bourdieusian view of class. Then, I address three issues: (i) class itself as an object of moral concern in society, particularly as a form of injustice; (ii) the general relation between class and morality, in terms of the harmony or dissonance between the two, and whether morality legitimises or challenges class, and (iii) the ways in which class affects, and is affected by, moral ideas, feelings and judgements, whether about self and other, practices and ways of living. I conclude by calling for further research which transcends the divide between sociological and normative or evaluative treatments of class and morality.",
author = "Andrew Sayer",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-4419-6896-8_9",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781441968944",
series = "Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "163--178",
editor = "Hitlin, {Steven } and Stephen Vaisey",
booktitle = "Handbook of the sociology of morality",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Class and morality

AU - Sayer, Andrew

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Class is argued to be of considerable moral significance, in relation to what people get in terms of resources and opportunities, what they contribute and achieve, who they become, how they value themselves and others, and how they behave towards others. I begin by sketching how we might conceptualise morality and class each in their own right, arguing against the dominant subjectivist and conventionalist treatment of morality in sociology, and recommending a multidimensional, largely Bourdieusian view of class. Then, I address three issues: (i) class itself as an object of moral concern in society, particularly as a form of injustice; (ii) the general relation between class and morality, in terms of the harmony or dissonance between the two, and whether morality legitimises or challenges class, and (iii) the ways in which class affects, and is affected by, moral ideas, feelings and judgements, whether about self and other, practices and ways of living. I conclude by calling for further research which transcends the divide between sociological and normative or evaluative treatments of class and morality.

AB - Class is argued to be of considerable moral significance, in relation to what people get in terms of resources and opportunities, what they contribute and achieve, who they become, how they value themselves and others, and how they behave towards others. I begin by sketching how we might conceptualise morality and class each in their own right, arguing against the dominant subjectivist and conventionalist treatment of morality in sociology, and recommending a multidimensional, largely Bourdieusian view of class. Then, I address three issues: (i) class itself as an object of moral concern in society, particularly as a form of injustice; (ii) the general relation between class and morality, in terms of the harmony or dissonance between the two, and whether morality legitimises or challenges class, and (iii) the ways in which class affects, and is affected by, moral ideas, feelings and judgements, whether about self and other, practices and ways of living. I conclude by calling for further research which transcends the divide between sociological and normative or evaluative treatments of class and morality.

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4419-6896-8_9

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4419-6896-8_9

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781441968944

T3 - Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research

SP - 163

EP - 178

BT - Handbook of the sociology of morality

A2 - Hitlin, Steven

A2 - Vaisey, Stephen

PB - Springer

CY - New York

ER -